Kinetic friction on incline/flat surface system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a mass sliding down an incline and then on a flat surface. The mass starts with a speed of 2.07 m/s and travels distances S1 and S2 on the incline and flat surface, respectively. The user is struggling to combine the motion equations for both sections to determine the acceleration on the incline, suspecting that the coefficients of friction may differ between the two surfaces. They seek guidance on how to approach the problem effectively, emphasizing their focus on the friction on the incline. Assistance is requested to clarify the calculations and concepts involved.
XxBollWeevilx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://nplq1.phyast.pitt.edu/res/msu/physicslib/msuphysicslib/13_EnergyConservation/graphics/prob27a_MechEnWFriction.gif

When mass M is at the position shown, it is sliding down the inclined part of a slide at a speed of 2.07 m/s. The mass stops a distance S2 = 1.9 m along the level part of the slide. The distance S1 = 1.18 m and the angle q = 32.50°. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction for the mass on the surface.


Homework Equations



F=ma
v^2=v_0^2+2ax
\mu_k=\frac{f}{F_n}=\frac{mgsin(\theta)-ma}{mgcos(\theta)}


The Attempt at a Solution



OK, I've been having trouble with this problem for a while now. Basicaly using the equations above I've tried to solve for a and plug that into the last formula there to get the coefficient of friction. However, this is proving to be very difficult for me, as I can't seem to combine the motion on the incline and the motion on the flat surface to find out what a on the incline is. I'm assuming that the accelerations are different for the two sections, and there is no indication that the coefficient is the same on the flat surface. I'm only interested in the friction on the incline, I believe.

Anyway, if anyone could offer a pointer I'd greatly appreciate it. I've been working on this a while and I can't seem to tell if I'm on the right track. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
wheres the picture?
 
I already posted the pic, maybe you can't see it for some reason. Here's a link:

EDIT: nevermind
 
Last edited:
It seems I can't post the picture because it's from a site that has to be logged into. Basically, to the left is an incline on which the block starts. The length of the incline is the s1 listed. Then at the bottom of the incline the path levels off and the length of the level part is s2. The block starts out on the top of the incline with the initial speed...this is the "position shown" referred to in the question.

ANY help would be super-appreciated.
 
No one has any clue?
 
bump

33pblev.gif
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top