Kinetics Problem: Non-constant force (calculus)

AI Thread Summary
A rock with mass m experiences a retarding force proportional to the square root of its instantaneous velocity, leading to a calculus problem involving its motion. The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for the rock's velocity and position as functions of time, and determining when it comes to rest and the distance traveled. The initial attempts to solve parts c and d were perceived as complex, involving quadratic equations. However, it was clarified that substituting v = 0 directly into the derived velocity function simplifies the process. The conversation highlights the importance of careful integration and substitution in solving dynamics problems involving non-constant forces.
Lola Luck
Messages
26
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A rock with mass m slides with initial velocity v0 on a horizontal surface. A retarding force F that the surface exerts on the rock is proportional to the square root of the instantaneous velocity of the rock (F = -kv1/2) . a) Find expression for the velocity of the rock as a function of time. b) Find expression for the position of the rock as a function of time. c) In terms of m,k, and V0 , at what time will the rock come to rest? d) In terms of m ,k and V0, what is the distance of the rock from its starting point when it comes to rest?

2. Relevant equation
f=ma A= dv/dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved parts a and b and I'm fairly certain my answers are correct.

F=−kv^(1/2)

a=dv/dt= (-kv^(1/2))/m

dv/(v^1/2)=(-kdt)/(m)

Integrate both sides and solve for the constant C

V= (k2 t2 )/ (4m2 ) - (ktv01/2)/m + v0

Then I integrated again to find position as a function of time.

The only way I can think to solve parts c and d is to solve V(t)=0 but this would require the quadratic equation and be very messy. Then, to solve part d, I would have to plug in answer to c into x(t) which is even messier. Is there another way? Am I missing something?

Any help would be great. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lola Luck said:
V= (k2 t2 )/ (4m2 ) - (ktv01/2)/m + v0
The only way I can think to solve parts c and d is to solve V(t)=0 but this would require the quadratic equation and be very messy.
Not at all messy, it turns out.
Lola Luck said:
Is there another way?
Slightly. After integrating dv/(v^1/2)=(-kdt)/(m), and determining the constant, substitute v = 0 without converting it to the quadratic form.
 
I made a calculation error and didn't realize until now that solving v(t) with a quadratic actually comes out neatly.
 
Thanks for your help
 
Lola Luck said:
Thanks for your help
My pleasure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top