Kirchoff's Loop Rule as applied to Capacitors?

AI Thread Summary
Kirchhoff's Loop Rule applies to capacitors by measuring potential differences in circuits that include resistors and capacitors. The voltage across a capacitor is defined by the equation v=q/C, and in calculus-based contexts, it relates current and voltage change over time. When analyzing RC circuits, the loop rule is essential for determining current flow, especially in steady-state conditions where the capacitor is fully charged. Current through a capacitor is zero only when the charge is constant, which occurs after a long time or when the circuit reaches equilibrium. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving problems involving capacitors in electrical circuits.
fatcat39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How does the loop rule apply to capacitors? I can't find any examples of circuits containing capacitors and resistors where the loop rule is used. I know the loop rule measures potential differences, but I'm not quite sure if that has anything to do with capacitors? All the examples are 0 = V - IR - IR, etc.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the loop rule is used with capacitors all the time. The element law for a capacitor is v=q/C. In more advanced (calculus-based) courses this is written i=C\frac{dv}{dt}. Solving this for the voltage, one obtains:

v=\frac{1}{C}\int_{t_0}^ti(\tau)d\tau+v(t_0)
 
all the basics of RC circuits (RL and RLC circuits too) come from a basic application of Kirchoff's Loop principle.
 
So when finding currents, the branch that a capacitor is on (in terms of current) is 0, right? since when a capacitor is full, no current flows.
 
not necessarily. it depends on the situation. Since charging rate = current, current=0 if and only if the charge of the capacitor is constant. This happens when the capacitor has been (dis)charging for a long time, or when the circuit reaches steady state.
 
Last edited:
the problem says that the currents reach equilibrium. isn't that steady state?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top