Kirchoff's radiative balance law and polarisation of emitted light

AI Thread Summary
Light reflected from a surface at an angle is polarized due to the Fresnel laws, which describe how different polarizations behave at a plane interface. According to Kirchoff's law of radiative balance, emissivity equals absorptivity, suggesting that if reflected light is polarized, then the emitted light may also exhibit polarization. The discussion highlights the importance of the angle of observation in determining the polarization state of emitted light. The Brewster angle is noted as a specific condition where reflected light can achieve perfect linear polarization. Overall, the emitted light can indeed have a degree of polarization, influenced by the surface properties and the angle of incidence.
Mark.R
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at a surface at an angle. Light reflected to me is polarised (Fresnel), does this mean light emitted to me from the surface is also polarised?

I've been told that ocean emission is polarised (when looking at an angle) because of Kirchoff's law of radiative balance (emissivity = absorptivity = 1 - transmission - reflection). They've told me that since reflection is polarised at that angle, absorption must be polarised and therefore emission is too.

But I don't see why it has to be and physically I don't see where it comes from. The only possible source I can see is something to do with the angle of observation. Can anyone help me?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Usually, both polarisations are not transmitted and reflected in the same way at a plane interface.
Therefore, the reflected light has a different polarisation mix than the incident light.

This is completely described by the Fresnel laws.
The Fresnel laws are a consequence of the Maxwell equations.

On wikipedia you can read the Fresnel laws in detail.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations

There is a special angle of incidence, called the Brewster angle, where one polarisation (E field in the incidence plane) is not reflected at all. In this case, the reflected light has a perfect linear polarisation, perpendicular to the incidence plane.
See there for the details:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster's_angle

The Brewster angle is a consequence of the Fresnel laws.
The Fresnel laws are a consequence of the Maxwell's equations.
The Maxwell's equations are the law of electromagnetism.
 
Last edited:
Mark.R said:
I'm looking at a surface at an angle. Light reflected to me is polarised (Fresnel), does this mean light emitted to me from the surface is also polarised?

I've been told that ocean emission is polarised (when looking at an angle) because of Kirchoff's law of radiative balance (emissivity = absorptivity = 1 - transmission - reflection). They've told me that since reflection is polarised at that angle, absorption must be polarised and therefore emission is too.

But I don't see why it has to be and physically I don't see where it comes from. The only possible source I can see is something to do with the angle of observation. Can anyone help me?

The emitted light may have a non-zero degree of polarization:

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-38-8-1384

Kirchoff's law is simply conservation of energy.
 
Thanks for the replies.

I'd already checked wiki and I can derive and apply the Fresnel equations (which is how I know reflected stuff can be polarised!) I think I didn't explain my question properly, but Andy has provided exactly the sort of derivation I'm looking for. Thanks Andy!
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top