I Klein-Gordon in QFT: Wave Functions & Spins

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Klein-gordon Qft
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! So in the Klein-Gordon equation you have a field ##\phi## which becomes an operator in QFT and when you apply it on the vacuum state ##|0>## you get a particle at position x: ##\hat{\phi}(x)|0>=|x>##. So if you look at this particle (in a non interaction theory) the wave function of this particle is a delta function (as you know it's exact position where it was created)? Also if you let the system evolve for a long amount of time, will the wavefunction of this particle turn into a free wave, as there is no potential, so it is basically a free particle? And if you apply the KG operator at the same initial position as before, you don't have 2 particles at position x, you have 1 particle localized at x and the other one (the first one) spread in space, is this right? Also the particle created is a spin 0 particle? Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll address the spin question first. The Klein-Gordon equation applies to any massive particle (and reverts to the wave equation for zero mass). It is agnostic about spin. Spin 1/2 particles which satisfy the Dirac equation also satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation.

As to the field satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation, it is rather a class of fields which can be partitioned into creators and annihilators of particles but not necessarily of particles localized at the origin or at any point.

In the mathematical construction of the field theory the textbooks will typically begin by interpreting the field as a field of operators acting at all points of space exciting the local field from the vacuum mode. But you should understand that this field of operators is not effecting an actualized operation. They rather act sort of like a position vector giving relative connection so that one may describe a given quantum actuality in terms of its difference from the vacuum actuality. Further these operators are utilized in combination and in superposition to decompose the physical actions which are actualized... e.g. the propagation of a physical field which can decomposed into a superposition of series of coupled creation-annihilation actions.

However, within all of that you can construct a creation operator for a particle localized as the origin and said particle should then over time propagate outward as dictated by the KG equation (and we can express this by the equivalence of the initial creation operator to the action of a later non-localized creation operator which creates from the vacuum that same spread out particle).

And then, yes a subsequent application of the creation operator may effect a situation with two particles however there's more to the story than just the KG equation and even the spin. There is a determination of the particle's statistics which the KG equation does not specify. The statistics of the particle field will slightly modify your description. For example if we assume the particle is a Fermion, no two of which can occupy the same quantum state, then attempting to create a second one at the origin will not yield a 100% 2 particle mode. The earlier particle may still have a finite probability of being at the origin thus, its wave function has a component which is not compatible with creating the 2nd particle. You will get a reduced amplitude indicating a less than 100% chance the result is a 2 particle system.

It's a bit hard to speak in this way though because again, you don't apply creators in isolation and so the interpretation is subject to inconsistency from the start.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top