I Kleppner & Kolenkow derivation error in free precession?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on potential errors in the derivation of wobbling motion in torque-free precession from Kleppner & Kolenkow's textbook. The user questions the signs in equations 8.25a and 8.25b, suggesting that 8.25a should have a negative cosine and 8.25b a positive sine. Additionally, they highlight a possible inconsistency in equations 8.26a and 8.26b, which they believe should have opposite signs. The user expresses uncertainty due to not having the book for reference, indicating a broader concern about the accuracy of the equations presented. The thread emphasizes the need for clarity in the derivation process to avoid confusion.
natz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I ended up to this section in K&K (2nd edition, but with 1st is the same) when they derive the wobbling motion of a simple body in torque-free precession. [see the attached file]
Equations 8.23 and 8.24 are integrated into 8.25[a|b], but I think signs are wrong. Shouldn't be negative cosine in 8.25a and positive sine in 8.25b ?
Another problem is that equations 8.26[a|b] have the same sign, shouldn't they be opposite ?
This is the second edition of the book so I'm doubting if I'm tired and missing something.

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • K&K.png
    K&K.png
    25 KB · Views: 502
Physics news on Phys.org
There are obviously inconsistencies in this concerning the signs. Given (8.23) in the next line (un-numbered equation) the sign is already wrong, because
$$\dot{\omega}_x=+A\gamma \cos(\gamma t+\phi).$$
I don't have the book, so I can't check the context.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top