Kronecker sum of more than two matrices?

Earthland
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question arises from this quote from wikipedia's article about kronecker product:

Kronecker sums appear naturally in physics when considering ensembles of non-interacting systems. Let Hi be the Hamiltonian of the i-th such system. Then the total Hamiltonian of the ensemble is
c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


I have to write this Htot as a ordinary sum over kronecker products of unity matrix and Hi-s.

Homework Equations



Kronecker sum for two matrices is defined as

3f1676452a4f1311f5d7a165e319b184.png


If A is n × n, B is m × m and Ik denotes the k × k identity matrix.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, as I undesratnd, now instead of A and B we have simply Hi and there should be sum kind of sum over i. But the Kronecker sum is defined only for a pair of matrices and it isn't commutative, so the order is important. I tried something like this, for three H-s:

upload_2015-2-27_12-59-47.png


But it doesn't look very elegant and I have no idea if this could be true. Any advice?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 597
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition is as follows

c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


H_{\text{Tot}} =\left( H_1 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right)+ \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes H_2 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right) + \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes H_3 \otimes ... \right) + ...
 
Are you sure? Thank you!
 
Proof:
Kronecker sum is associative.

In other words.
The Kronecker sum of two matrices is, as you wrote,
X=A\oplus B = A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B}

Now, since the sum ##A\oplus B## is a matrix, ##X##, the Kronecker sum
Y= X\oplus C = X\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes C = (A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B})\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes{C}
Of course ##\mathbb{I}_X=\mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B##, which gives
Y= A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes{C}

##Z= Y\oplus D = ## Keep going... :)
 
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top