B Why Are Numerical Examples Rare in Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
It's rare to encounter concrete, numerical examples of what is being taught about Relativity, Quantum Mechanics.. On the other hand there's plenty of numerical examples in the undergraduate general physics textbooks, for instance problems of mechanics.

As for General Relativity I did find only a few, and that was on Weinberg's book: tests of General Relativity (deflection of light by sun, etc...)

Is there a reason for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess one possibility is that GR QFT and QM textbooks are intended to experienced students, and if they want a numerical example they are capable of working out their own from what is being taught on the book as opposed to undergrad textbooks where students are not so smart.

Other possibility is that complicated differential equations and non standard integrals are typically involved in GR QFT and QM and actually getting results is difficult and would require a lot of space?
 
kent davidge said:
I guess one possibility is that GR QFT and QM textbooks are intended to experienced students, and if they want a numerical example they are capable of working out their own from what is being taught on the book as opposed to undergrad textbooks where students are not so smart.

"Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity" by Hartle has quite a few end-of-chapter problems, e.g., in the three pages that I have attached, there are at least 14 numerical problems.[/QUOTE]
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Mechanics including thermo-, fluid- , elastic-, statistical- , and electromagnetism are gone into the phase of application. Relativity and QM are following them.
 
You are contradicting yourself. If electromagnetism is applied then also relativity is applied since electromagnetism is the paradigmatic example of a relativistic field theory, and this was so even before even its discoverer, Maxwell and the rest of the physics community was aware of it ;-)). SCNR.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top