Ladder operators and the momentum and position commutator

kmchugh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
When using Fourier's trick for determining the allowable energies for stationary states, Griffiths introduces the a+- operators. When factoring the Hamiltonian, the imaginary part is assigned to the momentum operator versus the position operator. Is there a reason for this? If :

a-+ = k(ip + mwx)(-ip + mwx), and the commutator is (xp-px), Is

a+- = k(-ip = mwx)(ip + mwx) ?

If so, is the commutator (px-xp)?

Thanks in advance for your input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kmchugh,

The Fourier transform of the nabla (or del) operator and partial time derivative operator is \ \ \ \ \hat F(\nabla) = ik \ \ \ \ \ \hat F(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}) = -i\omega

Where spatial variables x, y, z are transformed into the wavenumber vector k and the time variable is transformed into the angular frequency scalar \omega

The first order nabla operator is associated with momentum and its transform contains i, meaning that it is an imaginary value when compared to the phase of position variables x, y, z.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top