Deriving Kinetic Energy in a Double Pendulum System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the kinetic energy of a double pendulum system using Lagrangian mechanics, specifically without a gravitational field. The participants detail the setup of two pendulums, each with a mass of 1kg and a rod length of 1m, and the transformation of their coordinates into Cartesian form. The key takeaway is the application of the chain rule for derivatives to compute the time derivatives of the Cartesian velocity components, leading to the kinetic energy equations T1=(dθ/dt)²/2 and T2=((dθ/dt)²+(dθ/dt+dα/dt)²)/2+(dθ/dt)(dθ/dt+dα/dt)cosα.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with double pendulum dynamics
  • Knowledge of Cartesian coordinate transformations
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly the chain rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Learn about the dynamics of double pendulum systems
  • Explore the application of the chain rule in physics
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational fields on pendulum motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamical systems, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of kinetic energy derivations in complex systems.

Andreas C
Messages
196
Reaction score
20
Ok, I'm reading up on Lagrangian mechanics, and there is a problem that I don't really understand: the double pendulum (in this case, without a gravitational field). So, I want to take it step by step to make sure I understand all of it.

We've got a pendulum (1) with a weight mass m=1kg attached to a rod of length r=1m making an angle of θ with the vertical, and another identical pendulum (2) attached on the weight of pendulum (1), making an angle α with it. Transforming these coordinates to Cartesian ones, we get x(1)=sinθ, y(1)=cosθ and x(2)=sinθ+sin(α+θ) and y(2) = cosθ+cos(α+θ).

Ok. So far so good. Now I am supposed to compute the time derivatives of the Cartesian velocity components in terms of the angles to compute the kinetic energy. How exactly am I supposed to do that? Since there is no t in these, I can't directly find their time derivatives, unless I use the equations that describe the motions of pendulums that are already known, but aren't these wrong in the case of a double pendulum?

I know that the results I am supposed to get for the kinetic energies are these:

T1=(dθdt)^2/2

T2=((dθdt)^2+(dθdt+dαdt)^2)/2+(dθdt)*(dθdt+dαdt)*cosα

I just have no idea how to get them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andreas C said:
Since there is no t in these
actually there is ##\alpha=\alpha(t),\quad \theta=\theta(t)##
Andreas C said:
with a weight mass m=1kg
this is not a good manner: you deprive yourself from opportunity of using the dimensions of physics quantities to check your formulas
 
Last edited:
wrobel said:
actually there is α=α(t),θ=θ(t)

What I meant was that it's not explicitly shown. Of course there is, but I don't know what the value of the function α(t) is.

wrobel said:
this is not a good manner: you deprive yourself from opportunity of using the dimensions of physics quantities to check your formulas

Well, I'm not the one who made the problem :)
 
Anyway, the question still stands, I still can't figure out what to do here.
 
Ok, I found the answer, here it is for anyone who might be interested:

Using the chain rule, we write say dx1/dt=sinθ as dθ/dt ⋅ d(sinθ)/dθ = dθ/dt ⋅ cosθ. If we plug this (and y1) into the equation for kinetic energy in this case (which is T1=(x^2+y^2)/2), and do some algebra, we eventually get the anticipated solution of T1=(dθ/dt)^2/2. It's the same thing for T2, only a bit more complicated. The point is that you're meant to apply the chain rule for derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K