I Lagrangian with constraint forces

AI Thread Summary
Lagrange's equations in Taylor's Classical Mechanics emphasize that the Lagrangian, L = T - U, excludes constraint forces since they do no work and act perpendicular to motion. The potential energy U is defined solely for non-constraint conservative forces, as constraint forces do not contribute to energy changes in the system. The Lagrangian framework is applicable when energy is conserved, focusing on conservative forces. For systems involving non-conservative forces, Lagrange multipliers must be used to incorporate additional terms into the Lagrangian. Properly defining generalized coordinates for kinetic energy (T) and potential energy (U) is crucial for accurate application.
C. Lee
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I am now reading Lagrange's equations part in Taylor's Classical Mechanics text.

It says:

When a system of interest involves constraint forces, F_cstr, and all the nonconstraint forces are derivable from a potential energy(U), then the Lagrangian for the system L is L = T - U, where U is the potential energy for the nonconstraint forces only, and thus this definition of L excludes the constraint forces.

Here's the question: How do we know that U in L = T - U is the potential energy for the nonconstraint forces only? Shouldn't it have contribution from constraint forces if some of constraint forces are conservative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C. Lee said:
Here's the question: How do we know that U in L = T - U is the potential energy for the nonconstraint forces only? Shouldn't it have contribution from constraint forces if some of constraint forces are conservative?

The reason is that constraint forces do no work.They just maintain the constrains of the system and their direction is always perpendicular to the direction of motion.
Scientists used work formulas to derive the Lagrangian equation,so the potential energy "U" in the Lagrangian corresponds to non-constraint conservative forces only and constraints forces have no contribution.
 
  • Like
Likes bluejay27 and C. Lee
amjad-sh said:
The reason is that constraint forces do no work.They just maintain the constrains of the system and their direction is always perpendicular to the direction of motion.
Scientists used work formulas to derive the Lagrangian equation,so the potential energy "U" in the Lagrangian corresponds to non-constraint conservative forces only and constraints forces have no contribution.
I would like to make more explicit this statement. The Lagrangian of L = T - V is used only when energy is conserved. Thus, going back to the statement that only conservative forces are being considered.
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh
bluejay27 said:
I would like to make more explicit this statement. The Lagrangian of L = T - V is used only when energy is conserved. Thus, going back to the statement that only conservative forces are being considered.
When you want to deal with nonconservative forces, you have to use Lagrange multipliers, where you are including an additional term to the L
 
The difficulty in using L is in defining the right generalized coordinates for T and V
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top