Lambert W Function: Solving for the Inverse of x^x = y

  • Thread starter Thread starter arpon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the inverse of the function f(x) = x^x, noting that there is no closed form expression for it. It highlights the use of the Lambert W function, which is the inverse of the function f(x) = xe^x. By taking the logarithm of both sides of the equation x^x = y, the transformation leads to the equation u e^u = ln(y), where u = ln(x). This allows for the solution x = exp(W(ln(y))). The Lambert W function thus provides a method to express x in terms of y for the original equation.
arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16
If, ##f(x)=x^x##, then, f-1(x)=?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there's a closed form expression for that.
 
Nicely done! I misread your answer at first and thought you had it wrong but saw that you are correct after working it out for myself. The Lambert W function is inverse to f(x)= xe^x but taking the logarithm of both sides of x^x= y gives xln(x)= ln(y) not xe^x= y.

Instead, once you have xln(x)= ln(y), let u= ln(x). Of course, then, x= e^{ln(x)}= e^u so the equation becomes
ue^u= ln(y), u= ln(x)= W(ln(y)) so that, as you say, x= exp(W(ln(y)).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top