Laminarflow in a two-dimensional passage

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizzyb
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
For laminar flow in a two-dimensional passage, the relationship between average and maximum velocities is established as u_max = 2u_avg. The discussion explores the integration of velocity profiles and the implications of flow geometry, questioning whether a two-dimensional passage refers to a square or rectangular shape. It highlights that, unlike three-dimensional flow in circular pipes, a fully developed profile in two dimensions remains parabolic. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using conservation of momentum to derive velocity relationships. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the confirmed velocity relationship for laminar flow in two-dimensional passages.
lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Exact Question from Book
For laminar flow in a two-dimensional passage, find the relation between the average and maximum velocities.

Relevant Equations, etc
I think for circular pipes we have:

u = u_max - kr^2 (1)

u: velocity
u_max: maximum velocity at center of the pipe

Work Done So Far
I played around with multiplying (1) by dA = 2 pi r dr and integrating but didn't really achieve much.

I'm not sure what they mean by "two-dimensional passage" - do they mean a square or rectangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If its two dimensional its cross sectional shape doesn't matter right?

Set up a two dimensional flow with uniform flow at the entrance and and a fully developed profile at the exit of your control volume.

Use conservation of momentum to find a relation between the velocities.
 
like this?
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/3605/21166978.jpg

how is this so different than the parabola flow we're used to seeing? because its not a 3-d tube?

so u_max is at the center and the median of a triangle is 2/3 the height;

u = 2/3 u_max.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No a fully developed profile in a 2d passage will be parabolic.
 
Hint: the answer is u_{max} = 2u_{avg}
 
Back
Top