Laplace equation derivation, where does the potential go

Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


(Wikipedia, image 1)

Homework Equations


6aa558a2b076e81bd4c97d6d5f168838.png


(Wikipedia, image 2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, -\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{q_{j}}}

How is speed involved in this derivative of potential by generalized coordinate (upper left, image 1)? Potential only depends on the position, we are assuming a conservative field, and that is what we are doing, how does this term disappear?
Feels like saying F=-\nabla V=0.
I mean, I can understand eg. generalized impulse depending on speed: p_{j}=\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}, but not the potential-evaporating transition:
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}\right)-\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{q_{j}}}=0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what is your question exactly? Cant quite follow.
 
My problem is in the sentence:
Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
And in:
\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{g_{j}}} disappearing from the very first statement.
So - where does it go, g_{j} is a generalized coordinate, not generalized velocity..?
 
For a conservative field, which is only dependent on position, the lagrangian is defined as: ##\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\dot q_j, q_j, t) = T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)##.

In particular, this means that:
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial \dot q_i} = {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j))
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}V(q_j)
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - 0$$
 
Thanks! That makes perfect sense, but it means that there is an error in:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
 
Well, what is the following?
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial q_i} = {\partial \over \partial q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)) $$
Uku said:
since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
Uhh :confused:
How do you get that?
 
I think I mixed up, the potentials subtract. Thanks!
 
Back
Top