Laplace transform and region of convergence

AI Thread Summary
The Laplace transform of the function x(t) = e^(-at) for 0 ≤ t ≤ T is calculated as X(s) = (1/(s+a))(1 - e^(-(s+a)T)). The region of convergence (ROC) is specified as Re{s} > -a, indicating that the transform converges under this condition. Outside this region, the Laplace transform does not exist. The calculations confirm that the initial attempt was correct in determining both the transform and the ROC. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing systems in engineering and applied mathematics.
redundant6939
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find the LT and specify ROC of:
x(t) = e-at, 0 ≤ t ≤ T
= 0, elsewhere
where a > 0

Attempt:
X(s) = - 1/(s+a)*e-(s+a) integrated from 0 to T
=> -1/(s+a)[e-(s+a) + 1]
Converges to X(s) = 1/(s+a) , a ⊂ R, if Re{s} > -a for 0≤t≤T
Elsewhere ROC is empty (LT doesn't exist).

Is this correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Laplace transform of ##f\left(t\right)## is:
$$ \mathscr{L}\left\{f\left(t\right)\right\} = F\left(s\right) = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}f\left(t\right) dt$$
Hence, the Laplace transform of your function is:
$$ X\left(s\right) = \int\limits_{0}^{T} e^{-at}e^{-st}dt + \int\limits_{T}^{\infty} 0 \cdot e^{-st}dt= \int\limits_{0}^{T} e^{-\left(a+s\right)t}dt = -\dfrac{1}{s+a}e^{-\left(s+a\right)t}\bigg|_{0}^{T}$$
$$ X\left(s\right) = \dfrac{1}{s+a}\left(1-e^{-\left(s+a\right)T}\right)$$
The ROC is as you stated: ##\Re\left\{s\right\}>-a##
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top