Laplace Transform solution for 2nd order differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a second-order differential equation using the Laplace Transform method. The user is struggling to derive the coefficients A, B, and C from their attempted solution and seeks assistance. They receive guidance on using methods like Cramer's rule for solving simultaneous equations. Additionally, there is a focus on checking arithmetic errors, particularly regarding the signs of coefficients in the equations. The user expresses gratitude for the help and plans to review their calculations based on the feedback received.
khnbaba
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



d^2x/dt^2 - 3 dx/dt + 2x= 2e^3t

give that at t=0, x=5, and dx/dt=7

Homework Equations


i can't figure out how to derive the values of A, B, and C from the attempted equation solution. please help me out here. thanks


The Attempt at a Solution


21enp00.jpg

bi5qpz.jpg

2iazrpy.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got three simultaneous equations in three unknowns, A, B, and C.

You can use elimination, Cramer's rule, guessing, whatever to solve for A, B, and C.

You've done good work up to this point. I'm surprised this point has stumped you.
 
thanks a lot steamKing you are being a big help, i went through cramer's rule examples and i think its going to solve my problem, i am going to try it now. plus i will learn some thing new :). i really appreciate your help. once again thanks
 
jf7s6f.jpg

2eygxti.jpg


SteamKing can you have a look to the final answer. thanks
 
For the second and third equations in your original system, for some reason you have the coefficients of A and C switched around.

Check your arithmetic in calculating the coefficients from the steps above that point, specifically where you let s = 0. Is the product of two negative numbers another negative number?
 
are you talking about equation 2, and eq 3 in the beginning?
and s=0 was just a supposition and the arithmetic below isn't part of the question which i realize now the product of two negative numbers should be positive not negative.
 
khnbaba said:
are you talking about equation 2, and eq 3 in the beginning?
and s=0 was just a supposition and the arithmetic below isn't part of the question which i realize now the product of two negative numbers should be positive not negative.

Yes. It appeared from your work that the calculations where s = 0 is where you started to calculate the coefficients of A, B, and C.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thanks a lot for your time and efforts.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top