Laplace's Equation and Seperation of Multivariable Differential Equation

AI Thread Summary
To separate a multivariable differential equation, assume the solution can be expressed as a product of two functions, one dependent on r and the other on θ, such as u(r, θ) = R(r)·Θ(θ). By substituting this into the differential equation, derivatives with respect to r will only affect R(r) and those with respect to θ will only affect Θ(θ). Rearranging the equation allows it to be expressed in a form where one side is independent of θ and the other of r, leading to the conclusion that both sides must equal a constant. This results in two independent differential equations, each with a single variable. The separation of variables method is applicable in specific cases, and once the equations are derived, techniques like Cauchy-Euler can be employed for solutions.
dduardo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
3
Can someone explain how to separate a multivariable differential equation into two independent differential equations? I'm having an issue solving for the potential in spherical co-ordinates in terms of r and theta.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say you have a differential equation that involves both r and \theta. The way separation of variables works is that you assume that the solution can be written as a product of two functions: one function that is ONLY a function of r and another function that is ONLY a function of \theta. Thus, you guess the solution

u(r, \theta) = R(r)\cdot \Theta(\theta)

You then insert this into your differential equation. Derivatives with respect to r will only affect the R(r) function (the \Theta(\theta) is not affected) and vice versa with derivatives with respect to \theta.

After you have determined how your differential equation looks when you have inserted this solution, you can rearrange the differential equation so that it looks something like

F(R''(r), R'(r), r) = G(\Theta''(\theta), \Theta'(\theta), \theta) (1)

Here I have assumed that your differential equation was second order in both r and \theta. To put it in this form usually requires dividing both sides of the equation by R(r)\cdot \Theta(\theta) but it can also involves other kinds of multiplications as well. The whole point of writing as I did in (1) is so you have one side of the differential equation that is completely independent of \theta and the other side that is completely independent of r.

When this is true, the only possibility is that each side of the differential equation is equal to constant. This is true because the ONLY function of say \theta that does not depend on \theta is a constant.

At this point you are done...you now have the following:

F(R''(r), R'(r), r) = constant = G(\Theta''(\theta), \Theta'(\theta), \theta)

So you have TWO differential equations of a single variable. In this process however you must realize that separation of variables only works in some cases and in the cases where it does work you must ask the question "Is this solution unique?" But for the problems you are doing in E&M you probably don't have to worry about this.
 
Thanks for the help. After I got both differential equations I was able to apply cauchy-euler to solve them.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top