MHB How Can Laplace's Method Simplify This Integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ra_forever8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Method
AI Thread Summary
Laplace's Method can be applied to the integral I_n(x) = ∫(log_e t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}} dt from 1 to 2 to simplify its evaluation as x approaches infinity. The key steps involve identifying the maximum of the exponent and expanding the functions around this point. The integral can be transformed into a more manageable form, leading to the approximation I_n(x) ∼ (1/n)x^{-2/n} ∫(τ^{(2-n)/n} e^{-τ} dτ) as x → ∞. For specific cases, the leading order behavior of I_1(x) and I_2(x) can be derived from this approximation. This method effectively reveals the asymptotic behavior of the integral for large x values.
ra_forever8
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Consider the integral
\begin{equation}
I_n(x)=\int^{2}_{1} (log_{e}t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}}dt
\end{equation}
Use Laplace's Method to show that
\begin{equation}
I_n(x) \sim \frac{1}{nx^\frac{2}{n}} \int^{\infty}_{0} \tau^{\frac{2-n}{n}} e^{-\tau} d\tau \end{equation}
as $x\rightarrow\infty$.
where $0<n\leq2$. Hence find the leading order behaviour of $I_{1}(x)$. and $I_{2}(x)$ as $x\rightarrow \infty$.
=>
Its really difficult question for me.
Here,
$g(t) = -(t-1)^{n}$ has the maximum at $t=0$
but $h(t)= log_{e}t$ at $t=0$
$h(0)=0$.
so I can not go any further. PLEASE HELP ME.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
grandy said:
Consider the integral
\begin{equation}
I_n(x)=\int^{2}_{1} (log_{e}t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}}dt
\end{equation}
Use Laplace's Method to show that
\begin{equation}
I_n(x) \sim \frac{1}{nx^\frac{2}{n}} \int^{\infty}_{0} \tau^{\frac{2-n}{n}} e^{-\tau} d\tau \end{equation}
as $x\rightarrow\infty$.
where $0<n\leq2$. Hence find the leading order behaviour of $I_{1}(x)$. and $I_{2}(x)$ as $x\rightarrow \infty$.
=>
Its really difficult question for me.
Here,
$g(t) = -(t-1)^{n}$ has the maximum at $t=0$
but $h(t)= log_{e}t$ at $t=0$
$h(0)=0$.
so I can not go any further. PLEASE HELP ME.

First it is useful to write the integral in a more suitable form...

$\displaystyle I_{n} (x) = \int_{0}^{1} \ln (1 + t)\ e^{- x\ t^{n}}\ d t\ (9)$

The Laplace integration of an expression like...

$\displaystyle I(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ e^{- x\ g(t)}\ dt\ (2)$

... consists in approximating (2) with an expression which is valid for 'large' x according with the following steps...

a) let's suppose that g(t) has a minimum in t= c, being c in [a,b]...

b) we expand in Taylor series f(t) and g(t) around t=c...

c) we extend the integration range in $(- \infty, + \infty)$ or in $[0, + \infty)$ if c=0 and try to use the properties of the Laplace Transform [that's why this procedure is called 'Laplace Integration'...]

Now we can procced taking into account that is $\displaystyle f(t) = \ln (1 + t) \sim t$, $\displaystyle g(t)= t^{n}$ which has a minimum in x=0...

$\displaystyle I_{n} (x) = \int_{0}^{1} \ln (1 + t)\ e^{- x\ t^{n}}\ d t \sim \frac{1}{n}\ \int_{0}^{\infty} \tau^{\frac{1}{n}-1}\ \ln (1 + \tau^{\frac{1}{n}})\ e^{- x\ \tau}\ d \tau\ \sim$

$\displaystyle \sim \frac{1}{n}\ \int_{0}^{\infty} \tau^{\frac{2}{n}-1}\ e^{- x\ \tau}\ d \tau = \frac{\Gamma (\frac{2}{n})}{n\ x^{\frac{2}{n}}}\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top