Large number of photons occupy the same quantum mechanical state?

Talib
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lasers produce a beam of light in which a large number of photons occupy
the same quantum mechanical state. Is it possible to build a similar device
producing such a beam of electrons? Explain.


Can anyone help? I don't know on which concept should I base this. I just need a starting point. Thanks

Talib
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wikipediate bosons and fermions. Which are photons? Which are electrons?
 
Thanks for the reply.

Great! I just started reading that.

Photons -> bosons -> they can occupy same state
Electrons -> fermions -> they can't occupy the same statebecause they are truly indistinguishable according to the Exclusion Principle -> thus we can't design the device

How does that sound?
 
Talib said:
Thanks for the reply.

Great! I just started reading that.

Photons -> bosons -> they can occupy same state
Electrons -> fermions -> they can't occupy the same statebecause they are truly indistinguishable according to the Exclusion Principle -> thus we can't design the device

How does that sound?

Good- but both fermions and bosons are truly indistinguishable. You should also Wikipediate 'Pauli exclusion principle'.
 
Alright .. thanks a lot .. that really helped :)

Talib
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top