Larmor precession and magnetic ordering

AI Thread Summary
Larmor precession describes the behavior of atomic magnetic moments in a magnetic field, but in ordered magnets like ferromagnets, this phenomenon is less discussed. The magnetic moments may appear "frozen" due to interactions with crystal fields or may precess uniformly in the same direction. The breaking of rotational symmetry in a compound can quench angular momentum, affecting the behavior of these moments. This concept relates to the energy levels of orbitals influenced by crystal field interactions. The discussion highlights the connection between Larmor precession and applications such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
DeathbyGreen
Messages
83
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


When we speak about Larmor precession we refer to atomic magnetic moments precessing in a magnetic field. In ordered magnets, such as ferromagnets, I never hear about larmor precession anymore. Are the magnetic moments frozen due to interactions with the surrounding crystal fields? Or all the moments precessing in the same direction? This isn't a homework question, just one I was thinking about and unable to find a good answer for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed. The moments do not even need to be ordered. In a compound, the rotational symmetry is broken, and this often leads to the angular momentum being quenched.
 
By rotational symmetry being broken, do you mean that the crystal field interaction forces the eg and t2 orbitals into different energy levels? I'm not to familiar with symmetry breaking but I'll try and read into it.
 
Yes, that is in cubic symmetry. Angular momentum is not a good quantum number unless there is rotational symmetry.
 
DeathbyGreen said:
I never hear about larmor precession anymore
Ahh...Magnetic Resonance Imaging owe's its existence to this!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top