Laser Physics or Artificial Intelligence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dilemma of choosing between Laser Physics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for scientific engagement. The original poster, who has a background in physics and is currently an embedded programmer, expresses a desire to avoid extensive mathematics, which is essential in both fields. Participants emphasize that engaging in scientific activities typically requires a solid understanding of mathematics, contradicting the poster's preference. While some argue that certain areas of biology may involve less math, the consensus is that both Laser Physics and AI demand significant mathematical knowledge, making them less suitable for someone averse to studying mathematics. The conversation highlights the importance of researching and understanding the requirements of each field before making a decision.
ahs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello.
I have a bachelor degree in physics and I'm an embedded programmer now.
I would like to engage in scientific activities, but I can't choose the area: Laser Physics or Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning, Pattern Recognition...).
I heard opinion that artificial intelligence - the area is quite boring, mainly related to the meticulous study of algorithms or "primitive selection of parameters for algorithms and preparation of input data for them."
By the way, I do not like studying mathematics in large quantities.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ahs said:
like studying mathematics in large quantities.


Then I believe you will enjoy neither Laser Physics or Artificial Intelligence.

The fact that you have listed two fields with so little in common suggests that you like the "idea" of these fields but you really know nothing about them. Do you research than follow what interests you.
 
ahs said:
I would like to engage in scientific activities
By the way, I do not like studying mathematics in large quantities.

Sorry, but those two statements are just contradictory.

You can't "engage in" any form of "scientific activity", except for reading pop-sci books, without "studying math in large quantities".
 
AlephZero said:
Sorry, but those two statements are just contradictory.

You can't "engage in" any form of "scientific activity", except for reading pop-sci books, without "studying math in large quantities".

unless you are doing biology or chemistry (at least some chemistry).
 
Physics_UG said:
unless you are doing biology or chemistry (at least some chemistry).

Sounds like you aren't really up-to-date with current biology.
 
analogdesign said:
Sounds like you aren't really up-to-date with current biology.

not all biology involves math so you can certainly do some biology without extensive math. I thought it was rather clear what I meant.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top