Lattice QED, most likely path of fields --> no interactions?

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Say I have a large spacetime lattice set up on a supercomputer where I calculate the scattering cross section of two spinless electrons of equal and opposite momentum via lattice QED. To get the right results we must add the amplitudes for every possible "path" the field can evolve from initial conditions?

Will the most likely "path" of the electron field be one where the spinless electrons do not interact at all (or "hardly at all", small delta p) because of the smallness of electric charge?

The interesting physics comes from the relatively small fraction of "paths" where electrons scatter?

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I think I'm confused above as we evolve the fields between initial and final conditions in the path integral?
 
Forget field theory for a moment and consider the path integral formulation for a single particle in regular QM. We specify a starting and ending position for the electron and ask for the amplitude for the electron to propagate from the given starting position to the given ending position. In most situations, the greatest contribution to this amplitude ends up coming from the set of paths that are fairly close to the classical path that connects the given starting and ending positions.

The same principle applies in field theory, but it's less useful because we don't usually specify two field configurations and ask for the amplitude to go from one to the other. We are usually interested in scattering amplitudes of particles, but particles are complicated quantum excitations of the fields. A one-particle state, for example, is actually a superposition of an infinite number of field configurations.

In practice to compute a scattering amplitude on the lattice we use the LSZ formula to relate a scattering amplitude to a vacuum expectation value of some product of field variables. A vacuum expectation value can be written as a path integral where we sum over *all possible* initial and final field configurations. So this is what we do in lattice calculations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top