Law of conservation of mass question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the law of conservation of mass, which states that matter cannot be created or destroyed in a chemical reaction. However, this principle has evolved with the understanding of mass-energy conservation, where mass can be converted into energy and vice versa, particularly relevant in nuclear reactions. The conversation also addresses the concept of "unburning," specifically regarding calx, a metal oxide left after heating metal. It is clarified that calx can be reduced back to metal through a chemical process involving charcoal, which removes oxygen from the calx, effectively restoring the metal. This reduction process is a fundamental method used in metallurgy for thousands of years, demonstrating that while matter cannot be destroyed, its forms can change through chemical reactions.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
" In a chemical reaction matter can be neither created nor destroyed "

So does this law only apply to chemical reactions or can matter ever be destroyed or created in any way shape or form?


and do people believe that something that has been burned can be unburned?
It says that when metal is heated it leaves behind calx and that if you want to remove the calx and combine it with charcoal you can then heat the calx will become metal again, this seems untrue, this is in a science book, not sure whether or not they are talking about a theory that existed at one time or if this is believed to be true now a days that something can be un burned ?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
land_of_ice said:
" In a chemical reaction matter can be neither created nor destroyed "

So does this law only apply to chemical reactions or can matter ever be destroyed or created in any way shape or form?

Mass conservation has been replaced by mass&energy conservation - that is, mass can be converted directly into energy and vice versa. But for most practical purposes mass conservation still holds, it becomes important when you are close to c or when you are talking about nuclear eactions.

and do people believe that something that has been burned can be unburned?
It says that when metal is heated it leaves behind calx and that if you want to remove the calx and combine it with charcoal you can then heat the calx will become metal again, this seems untrue, this is in a science book, not sure whether or not they are talking about a theory that existed at one time or if this is believed to be true now a days that something can be un burned ?

Calx is usually a metal oxide - and it can be decomposed back into metal and oxygen. It doesn't have to be easy, but it is always doable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
land_of_ice said:
It says that when metal is heated it leaves behind calx and that if you want to remove the calx and combine it with charcoal you can then heat the calx will become metal again, this seems untrue, this is in a science book, not sure whether or not they are talking about a theory that existed at one time or if this is believed to be true now a days that something can be un burned ?

This is called reduction (the opposite of oxidation). The heated charcoal produces carbon monoxide, which steals the oxygen from the metal oxide, turning it back into metal again.

It's how people have produced metal from ore for ten thousand years.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top