Studying Learn Quantum Physics: Bohr's Atomic Model

AI Thread Summary
Focusing on Bohr's atomic model can provide a foundational understanding of discrete energy levels, which is crucial for transitioning to Schrödinger's equation. While Bohr's model is often considered outdated, it effectively predicts energy levels for one-electron atoms and introduces key concepts relevant to quantum mechanics. However, the details of Bohr's derivation do not translate to Schrödinger's model, which presents a fundamentally different view of atomic structure. For those studying quantum physics, it is advisable to prioritize the concept of energy levels from Bohr's model while recognizing its limitations. Ultimately, understanding Bohr's contributions can enhance comprehension of more advanced quantum mechanics.
mrhxszp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to learn quantum physics on my own and while doing this I came across bohr's atomic model. What parts should I focus on the bohr's atomic model so advancing to schrodinger's equation will be easy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bohr's model of atom is outdated and I believe can be safely skipped if you don't care too much about the historical timeline in the field of quantum physics. It successfully predicts some properties of the simplest atom, one-electron atom, such as energy levels. The same expression can obviously be obtained using the more formal Schroedinger equation approach. The derivation requires a bit of intermediate level calculus though, while the Bohr's model present it in a more empirical manner.
 
  • Like
Likes mrhxszp
mrhxszp said:
What parts should I focus on the bohr's atomic model so advancing to schrodinger's equation will be easy?
In my opinion, the only part of the Bohr model (and Sommerfeld's model that introduced elliptical orbits) that is worth "keeping" is the concept of discrete energy levels. The details of how Bohr "derived" the energy levels for hydrogen do not carry over to Schrödinger's model. Schrödinger's model uses fundamentally different assumptions and procedures, and produces a completely different "picture" of the structure of the atom: fuzzy "probability-clouds" versus sharp circular or elliptical orbits.

You should study the details of Bohr's derivation only if you are deeply interested in the history of quantum physics, and can keep it separate from the study of "real" quantum mechanics. Bohr's model is mostly a dead-end or cul-de-sac as far as physics is concerned.

I taught an "introductory modern physics" course for more than 20 years. In the early years, I spent some time on the derivation of the Bohr model. Later on, I simply introduced the energy-level formula and gave some examples and exercises on applying it to calculate photon energies in various transitions between levels. This gave me more time to spend on Schrödinger's model.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mrhxszp
mrhxszp said:
I am trying to learn quantum physics on my own and while doing this I came across bohr's atomic model. What parts should I focus on the bohr's atomic model so advancing to schrodinger's equation will be easy?

In my experience as an atomic physicist, the Bohr-Sommerfeld approach underpins lots of semiclassical ideas that always tended to be floating around when interpreting what is happening physically and not just beating the Schrodinger into submission with advanced numerical methods that offer little insight.

Bohr-Sommerfeld is also the starting point for understanding other semiclassical methods like the WKB approximation and periodic orbit theory.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mrhxszp
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top