Learning moments in statics currently

  • Thread starter Thread starter hisotaso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving a force into its x and y components and applying Varignon's Theorem to find moments at different points on a diagram. The user expresses confusion over the distinction between the "vector approach" and the principle of moments, questioning whether they are essentially the same. It is noted that the vector approach involves using both a force vector and a distance vector. The user seeks clarification on how to proceed with the problem given the unclear definitions in their text. Understanding the differences between these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
hisotaso
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Skip to the bottom for the short version...

We are learning moments in statics currently, and I have a problem that asks me to resolve the force given into x and y components, then, using "the principle of moments" aka Varignon's Theorem, find the moment with that same force applied at different points on the diagram, all of course resulting in the same moment about the given point.

That is easy enough, however, the last part of the question asks me to find the moment using "a vector approach". It seems to me, based on both my opinion and the rather unclear description of vector approach given in my text, that the principle of moments and vector approach are the same thing...Based on that, am I am unsure how to proceed..

What is the difference between "vector approach" and "the principle of moments", aka Varignon's thm.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Using vectors requires two vectors, both a force and a distance vector.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
86
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top