Learning Optics, SR, and Continuum Mechanics for Physics Qual Exam

AI Thread Summary
For preparing for a physics qualifying exam focusing on optics, special relativity (SR), and continuum mechanics, several recommended textbooks are highlighted. For optics, Hecht's "Optics" is suggested as a primary resource, with additional recommendations including Pedrotti's "Introduction to Optics" and Fowles's "Introduction to Modern Optics," the latter being a more affordable but less comprehensive option. For advanced study, Saleh & Teich's "Fundamentals of Photonics" and Born & Wolf's "Principles of Optics" are noted, with the latter being a standard reference in the field. For special relativity, the first edition of "Spacetime Physics" is recommended for its worked solutions. The discussion also points out that the department's syllabus is vague and provides outdated sample problems, which may complicate exam preparation.
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
I need to learn optics, SR and continuum mechanics for my physics qual exam in June. Can anyone suggest some books that would be appropriate for self study?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the optics portion, Hecht's Optics should contain material at an adequate level. Other books at a similar level include Pedrotti$^3$'s Introduction to Optics, and Fowles's Introduction to Modern Optics. (Fowles might be a bit thin to use as your sole reference, but it's cheap, so it's worth picking up to supplement either Hecht or Pedrotti.) At a slightly more difficult level is Saleh & Teich's Fundamentals of Photonics, and at a much more difficult level is Born & Wolf's classic tome, Principles of Optics. (Born & Wolf is pretty much the standard reference for researchers in the field.)
 
Doesn't your department have a syllabus? It would be beyond sadistic just to tell you to "learn optics."
 
They do, but it's vague. And they provide sample problems, but they are really pathetic photocopies of photocopies of photocopies of problems that were used in the 40s (some are hand written). I think they try to make the exam extra hard by handing out useless study guides to confuse you.
I guess I am kidding, but it is kind of bad.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top