Learning Statistical Physics for Beginners with Maths Background

AI Thread Summary
Interest in statistical physics is growing, particularly for its applications in learning theory and biology. A participant with a background in mathematics and limited physics experience seeks recommendations for accessible resources. Key suggestions include "Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics" by Friedrick Reif as a suitable introductory text. Another mention is "Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics," though caution is advised against a specific book criticized for its confusing presentation and excessive jargon. The discussion highlights the importance of clear explanations and manageable complexity in learning materials for those new to the subject.
Cincinnatus
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
I've recently gotten interested in statistical physics. Notions derived from this area are frequently applied in learning theory and other areas of biology which are of interest to me.

I'm wondering if anyone knows of a good book or web resource for learning about statistical physics that would be appropriate for someone with my background.

I have almost no physics background at all. The only physics class that I ever took was a high school AP physics -mechanics class years ago.

My undergraduate degree was in mathematics and recently I've been putting a lot of time into studying stochastic dynamics (Ito calculus, stochastic PDEs etc).

Does anyone know of a book on statistical physics that I could learn from? I tend to have trouble reading physics books due to the extensive use of physics jargon with which I am unfamiliar.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many good introductory statistical physics texts. The book by Friedrick Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, serves as a pretty good introduction.
 
Also: Introduction to medern statistical mechanics, Chandler
 
Do NOT get this book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1568811969/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This is the one I used for undegrad statistical mechanics. The course was very interesting but the book sucked. The questions were pretty vague or just confusing and the material was presented the same way. You'd see huge jumps in derivation or variables used that weren't explained until later.

The worst part is that he would use the letter "n" in various fonts and stuff for about 50 variables. I'm not even joking. It got so confusing to just try and figure out what his variables mean...
 
Wow, I just found out I get a different teacher and hence not that book for stat mech next semester.

Looks like I may have lucked out.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top