Least action principle for a free relativistic particle (Landau)

provolus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Reading the Landau's "The classical theory of fields" (chapter 2, section 9 ) I have some doubts in explaining the steps in derivig the formula for the variation of the action for the relativistic free particle http://books.google.it/books?id=QIx...age&q="to set up the expression for"&f=false". Given the invariant element of measure:

ds=\sqrt{dx_idx^i}

where x^i ( x_i ) are the four contravariant (covariant) coordinates which parametrize the world line of the free particle, I have to vary respect x^i, that is I make the variation \delta x^i. So my doubts are about the second step of the formula before the 9.10, that is why:

\delta(ds)=\frac{d x_i \delta d x^i}{ds}

is obtained, instead of (IMH and erroneous O):

\delta(ds)=\frac{d x_i \delta d x^i}{2 \cdot ds}

?

Can someone be so kind to show me the steps?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is \delta \left(x_{i}x^{i}\right) = ?
 
It should be:

\delta (x_i x^i) = \delta (c^2t^2-r^2) = 2 (c^2 t \delta x^0 - r \delta x^i)

but, sorry, I don't get the point... that is... should I calculate

\delta (dx_i dx^i)

?
 
The "d" in the brackets is not important. That 2 you have obtained in front cancels the one in the denominator, thus giving you the final expression from Landau's book.
 
thx for the moment. I hope to need no more help in covariant variation calculus... ;-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top