1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Legendre polynomial problem

  1. Sep 22, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    The Legendre polynomials [tex]P_l(x)[/tex] are a set of real polynomials orthogonal in the interval [tex]-1< x <1[/tex] , [tex] l\neq l' [/tex]

    [tex]\int dx P_l(x)P_l'(x)=0, -1<x<1[/tex] The polynomial [tex]P_l(x)[/tex] is of order l
    , that is, the highest power of x is [tex]x^l[/tex]. It is normalized to [tex]P_l(x)=1 [/tex]

    Starting with the set of functions ,

    [tex] \varphi_l(x)=x^l, l=0,1,2,...,[/tex] used the orthogonalization procedure to derive the polynomials [tex] P_0,P_1,P_2, and P_3[/tex]
    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I have no idea what my book (Peebles) means by orthogonalization procedure. But I looked at Griffifth book on QM , and perhaps they are talking about Rodrigues formula on p. 136 eqn. 4.28?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2009 #2
  4. Sep 22, 2009 #3
    Still a little confused .so for l= 0 , would look like this: [tex]|e_0>=e_0/||e_0||[/tex]
  5. Sep 22, 2009 #4
    P_n(x) are the original functions, the orthonormal functions are denoted by R_n(x). Normalize the first:

    R_0(x) = P_0(x)/sqrt[<P_0|P_0>]

    Take the second function, and subtract the component in the direction of R_0(x):

    Q_1(x) = P_1(x) - <P_1|R_0> R_0(x)

    The inner product of Q_1 with R_0 is clearly zero. Normalize Q_1 by dividing it by the square root of its inner product with itself to get R_1. Then you compute Q_2 by subtracting from P_2 the components in the direction of

    Q_2(x) = P_2(x) - <P_2|R_1> R_1(x) - <P_2|R_0> R_0(x)

    Normalize Q_2 to obtain R_2.

    Then when you're done, you renormalize the R_n to make the coefficients of the highest powers equal to 1.
  6. Sep 22, 2009 #5
    sorry , this might take me a while to absorb in:

    [tex]R_0=P_0/(P_0,P_0),(P_0,P_0)=1?[/tex]; [tex]Q_2=P_2(x)[/tex] since [tex]<P_2|R_1>=0, <P_2|R_0>=0[/tex]

    [tex]\varphi_0=1,\varphi_1=x,\varphi_2=x^2[/tex]; When do all 3 phi's and the integral expression come into play? How do I obtain [tex]P_0, P_1,P_2[/tex]
  7. Sep 23, 2009 #6
    I think i got it! [tex]P_0=c_0,P_1=d_1*x+d_0,P_2=e_2*x^2+e_1*x+e_0,P_3=f_3*x^3+f_2*x^2+f_1*x+f_0,P_0(1)=1=>c_0=1,P_1(1)=1=d_1*x+d_0,P_2(1)=1=e_2*x^2+e_1*x+e_0,P_3(1)=1=f_3*x^3+f_2*x^2+f_1*x+f_0[/tex]Using integration I need to show that:

    [tex]\int P_0*P_1 dx=0[/tex] ,[tex]\intP_0*P_2 dx= 0[/tex], [tex]\int P_0*P_3=0[/tex],[tex]\int P_1*P_2=[/tex],[tex]\int P_1*P_3=0[/tex],[tex]\int P_2*P_3=0[/tex] all on interval -1<x<1[/tex](look at my latex code, output might not my input accurately)

    calculated [tex]c_o[/tex] ,not sure how to calculate [tex]d_1,d_0,e_0,e_1,e_2,f_0,f_1,f_2,f_3[/tex] I think all of the terms will be equal to zero or one though.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
  8. Sep 23, 2009 #7
    hard time reading my solution again
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook