Why Does Length Contraction Differ When Calculated at an Angle?

saadhusayn
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Hi,

My question concerns the following problem from chapter 4 of Special Relativity by A.P. French. A statement of the problem:

4-15 A flash of light is emitted at point O and is later reabsorbed at point P. In frame S, the line OP has a length l and makes an angle θ with the x axis. In a frame S' moving relative to S with a constant velocity v along the x axis:

(a) How much time τ' elapses between emission and absorption of the light?

(b) What is the spatial separation l' (l primed) between the point of emission and the point of absorption of the light?I solved part (a) correctly using the transformation equation t' = γ(t – vx / c^2), taking t to be l/c (i.e. the time the light takes to make it across OP in the S frame and x to be lcos θ. My answer is γl(1- β cos θ)/c, where β = v/c. I solved part b correctly by multiplying the answer to part a by c. I get γl(1- βcos θ).

The problem is, when I try to solve part (b) using an alternate method, I get a different answer. My reasoning is this:

The horizontal x-component of OP (lcos θ) looks contracted in the S' frame while the vertical component (lsin θ) is unaffected. So (l')^2 = (lcosθ /γ)^2 + (lsinθ)^2. So my final answer is

l' = l(1- β^2cos^2 θ)^1/2

Why is the second result different from the answer to part (b)? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

saadhusayn said:
The problem is, when I try to solve part (b) using an alternate method, I get a different answer. My reasoning is this:

The horizontal x-component of OP (lcos θ) looks contracted in the S' frame while the vertical component (lsin θ) is unaffected. So (l')^2 = (lcosθ /γ)^2 + (lsinθ)^2.

Did you take into account the fact that the point P moves relative to frame S' while the light is propagating from O to P?
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top