Length contraction near the speed of light

chrispegg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It is my understanding that an astronaut could get from Earth to the far edge of the Milky Way within the length of a human lifetime if she were traveling close enough to the speed of light. From earth’s perspective, time would pass very slowly for her as she moved across the galaxy. From the spaceship’s perspective, the length of the galaxy would contract in her direction of motion with respect to the galaxy.

Therefore, it seems to me that, from the astronaut’s perspective, the distance between Earth and the far edge of the galaxy would be very short (comparatively speaking) in her direction of motion. But, of course, the number of stars in the Milky Way that she will pass on her journey will not change.

How do all those stars fit in such a small space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chrispegg said:
How do all those stars fit in such a small space?
They are also contracted.
 
Yes, but hasn't all of physics changed from the spaceship's perspective? How, for instance, do all the atoms of a contracted star fit within such a short distance without collapsing into a black hole?

Does the astronaut have to teach her child a different kind of physics regarding the size of an electron orbit around a hydrogen atom, etc?
 
chrispegg said:
Yes, but hasn't all of physics changed from the spaceship's perspective? How, for instance, do all the atoms of a contracted star fit within such a short distance without collapsing into a black hole?

Does the astronaut have to teach her child a different kind of physics regarding the size of an electron orbit around a hydrogen atom, etc?
Many laws of physics, such as the one that you hint at, are formulated for systems that are in rest; that allows for the simplest formulation. They should not be applied to moving systems, instead the moving system description must be transformed to that of a rest frame. This is to a lesser extent already the case in classical (Newtonian) mechanics: the orbits of planets in a moving solar system are not ellipses but spirals. And of course, this problem does not occur for the electron orbits of the spaceship's atoms.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
5K
Back
Top