Length of curve in Polar coordinate system

ltd5241
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I want to caculate length of curve in Polar coordinate system like this: if r=r(a)
then length of the curve is ∫r(a)da Is this right? if not ,why ?
What's the right one ?
I konw the way in rectangular coordinate system,I just want to do it in Polar coordinate system .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can think of it like an infinitesimal form of the Euclidean distance formula. For a function f(t)=\langle x_1(t),x_2(t),x_3(t),\ldots\rangle

\sum_a^b \sqrt { \Delta x_1^2 + \Delta x_2^2+\Delta x_3^2+\ldots } \longrightarrow s=\int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { dx_1^2 + dx_2^2+dx_3^2+\ldots} = \int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { \left(\frac{dx_1}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dx_2}{dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dx_3}{dt}\right)^2+\ldots}\text{ } dt
 
Is this ∫r(a)da wrong? Why?
 
You need to know what the appropriate infinitesemal length segments are!

Now, if you do polar coordinates, you may decompose a stretch of a curve into two parts:
1. The change in the radial position from the initial point on the curve to the final point.
Infinitesemally, this has length dr.

2. Here's the tricky part: The tiny arc by which the curve segment can be approximated by a circular arc, supported by a tiny angular change between the first point and the final point on the curve.
Clearly, that circular arc lies AT a radius of the value "r", and setting the angular change as d\theta[/tex], we get the expression rd\theta[/tex] for that length segment.<br /> <br /> 3. Now, we apply the Pythogorean theorem to these two length segment to gain the proper curve segment ds:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(dr)^{2}+(rd\theta)^{2}}<br /> <br /> 4. Assuming that the radial position of the point of the curve is describable as a function of the angular variable, we may rewrite this as:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 5. This is then the proper infinitesemal form of the lengthn segment, and the length s of the curve can then be calculated as:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 6. Note that in the case of a CIRCLE, where r is a constant function of the angle, this reduces to:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}rd\theta<br /> as it should do.
 
Thank you ! Especially you,Arildno.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top