Length of Skid Marks: How Can I Solve This Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wcbryant87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Marks
AI Thread Summary
To determine the length of skid marks for a 1000 kg car skidding to a halt on wet concrete with a coefficient of friction of 0.60, the correct approach involves using the equation for acceleration and the kinematic equation for distance. The initial speed is 40 m/s, and the frictional force provides the necessary deceleration. The user initially miscalculated the acceleration and distance, leading to an incorrect result. Upon realizing the need to square the initial speed in the calculations, the correct skid mark length is identified as 136 meters. This highlights the importance of careful application of physics equations in solving such problems.
wcbryant87
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1000 kg car traveling at a speed of 40 m/s skids to a halt on wet concrete where \muk = 0.60. How long are the skid marks?



Homework Equations



Vf = Vi + 2ad
fk = \mukN = ma



The Attempt at a Solution


This problem is driving me crazy. Nowhere in the book does it tell you how to do this or even a similar problem. Plus, online, all I can find is how to find the speed once you've found the length of the skid marks! And yes, I tried doing the problem in reverse but the answer never comes out right.

Here is what I've done.

1000 * 9.8 = 9800
9800 *.6 = 5880
acceleration = 5880/1000 = 5.88

0 = 40 + 2 * 5.88 * d
d = 3.4

I know I've done something incredibly wrong here because the answer in the back of the book is 136!

I appreciate the help

a(1000) = 5800
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0 = 40 + 2 * 5.88 * d

That 40 should be squared!
 
oh wow. thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top