Lenz's Law: Direction of Induced Current

AI Thread Summary
According to Lenz's Law, the direction of an induced current in a conductor due to a changing magnetic field is to oppose the effect that produces it, making option D the correct answer. Participants in the discussion express confusion about the requirements for submitting solutions, questioning whether a simple answer suffices or if a detailed explanation is necessary. The importance of Lenz's Law is emphasized, particularly the concept of opposition to flux changes. One contributor reflects on their previous exam experience, highlighting the significance of mentioning Lenz's Law in physics problems. Understanding Lenz's Law is crucial for accurately determining the behavior of induced currents in electromagnetic contexts.
wakejosh
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


15. According to Lenz's law, the direction of an induced current in a conductor due to a change in the magnetic field near the conductor will be that which tends to produce which of the following effects?

a. Enhance the effect which produces it
b. Produce the greater heating effect
c. Produce the greatest voltage
d. Oppose the effect which produces it
e. There is no connection between the magnetic field and the flow of current

The Attempt at a Solution


My understanding is that this would be D. is this correct? any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, holy moderators, what is the rule for this kind of question?
For, lo!, no work has been submitted, but indeed, what sort of work can be submitted for a problem such as this?
Shall an equation alone suffice as "attempted solution"? Shall a detailed discussion of the equation be required torture? Or can we just say yes or no??

edit: WakeJosh, I have the same question about your other thread.
 
Right.

Lenz's law states exactly that, 'The direction of any induced current is such as to oppose the flux change which causes it'

Oppose is the key word here.
 
i'd say D, just because i see the words "oppose motion"

On my last physics test, i got a 96 because i forgot to mention Lenz's law. darn.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top