Leo's book [energy loss of heavy charged particles]

BUI TUAN KHAI
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am reading the "Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments" of W.R.Leo.
I am confused when reading the section 2.2. Energy Loss of Heavy Charged Particles in Atomic Collisions (page 21).

At the beginning of the second paragraph (from the bottom up), it is written that "Of the two electromagnetic processes" ? Why is it written like this? I think electromagnetic processes are X-rays, gamma-rays, etc., but not charged particles !

Please give me some explanations or advises if you have.

Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He starts that section "These effects are primarily the result of two processes: 1) inelastic collisions with the atomic electrons of the material. 2) Elastic scattering from nuclei".

These are the two electromagnetic processes he is referring to in that sentence, and saying that inelastic collisions on atomic electrons are the dominant process, as elastic scattering from nuclei happens much rarely, and does not transfer as much energy.

They are electromagnetic processes as they are mediated by the electromagnetic interaction.

Hope this helps!
 
  • Like
Likes BUI TUAN KHAI
@e.bar.goum :
Thank you for your response

e.bar.goum said:
They are electromagnetic processes as they are mediated by the electromagnetic interaction.

Hope this helps!

"mediated by the electromagnetic interaction" ? what do you mean about this? Could you please explain more clearly for me?
 
Ok, so, as I'm sure you know, there are four fundamental forces of nature - strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravitation. Anytime a physical process happens, like the scattering of nuclei off of electrons, one of the four forces needs to be responsible for making the process happen. For instance, the gravitational interaction is what keeps planets in orbit. The weak interaction is responsible for beta decay of nuclei, and the strong force is what keeps nuclei together.

In the case of nuclear scattering, this is in the most part due to the electromagnetic interaction - the nucleus and the electron come close to each other, and exchange photons, which we say are the "force carrying" particles for electromagnetism, and the electron and the nucleus scatters off of each other.

Another example of an electromagnetic interaction is the Coulomb repulsion of two like charges, or how particles move in magnetic fields.

Does that clear it up?
 
  • Like
Likes BUI TUAN KHAI
It is fantastic ! Thank you so much.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top