Letters of Recommendation Waiver

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doctor Elect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recommendation
AI Thread Summary
Waiving the right to see college recommendations is commonly advised, as it can enhance the perceived honesty and credibility of the recommendations. Admissions committees may view confidential recommendations as more trustworthy, potentially leading to a stronger impression of the applicant. Concerns exist that not waiving the right could suggest a lack of confidence in the recommendations or that the teacher may have felt pressured to write positively. While theoretical risks are acknowledged, the actual impact of not waiving the right remains uncertain, leading to a preference for confidentiality among many applicants. Ultimately, the standard advice is to waive the right for a more favorable evaluation.
Doctor Elect
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question. I'm passing out college recommendations right now and it asked me whether or not I want to waive my right to see the recommendations. My friends swears that not waiving your right can actually hurt you becuase they will think the teachers aren't being honest. Is this true.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think the opposite, if you don't waive your right to see them, then when the admissions looks at them, they don't know if the glowing rec is because you really deserve it, or because the person who wrote it knew you could read it later so they didn't say anything bad.
 
jbusc said:
I would think the opposite, if you don't waive your right to see them, then when the admissions looks at them, they don't know if the glowing rec is because you really deserve it, or because the person who wrote it knew you could read it later so they didn't say anything bad.

oops, I forgot to put "not" in the paragraph
 
I know all the theoritical ways in which it could hurt but does anyone know if it actually does. Because I want to see my recommendations if it doesn't seriously hurt me.
 
Standard advice is to waive your right. Confidential rec is weighted more heavily.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
627
Replies
57
Views
5K
Back
Top