Leveling mounts for a platform to hold around 300 lbs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustinLiang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Platform
AI Thread Summary
To build a platform that holds around 300 lbs, leveling mounts with a capacity of 600 lbs are recommended over those with a 300 lbs capacity, despite similar pricing. The mounts are adjustable, allowing for height modifications, but the actual table height must account for the minimum height of the mounts and additional nut height. The thread length of 2 1/2 inches allows for some adjustment, but the usable height may be less due to internal threading. For the platform material, it's important to choose one that matches the load capacity, especially if vibration damping is a concern. Proper selection of mounts and materials is crucial for stability and functionality.
JustinLiang
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I need to build a platform (10 in off the ground) that can hold a fan, air damper and silencer which is in total around 300 lbs of weight. I was looking at these leveling mounts that I could use for the table feet:

VZSO9qw.png


I noticed that there is one that says 300 lbs capacity per mount and another one says 600 lbs capacity per mount. They are the same price so why would anyone want to purchase the 300 lb one?

Also, I just want to make sure... You can adjust these right? In case you want to make your table slightly higher?

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes. they adjust. Note that they have a minimum height (C - A) of 13/16". So your actual physical table needs to be 10" - 13/16" = 9 3/16" in height. And you have to accommodate for the additional height of the nut. I do not see that value.
 
jim mcnamara said:
Yes. they adjust. Note that they have a minimum height (C - A) of 13/16". So your actual physical table needs to be 10" - 13/16" = 9 3/16" in height. And you have to accommodate for the additional height of the nut. I do not see that value.

So the 2 1/2" thread length means that you can adjust the table up to 2 1/2"? Or would it be less since some of the thread length is inside the mount.

Also, what material do you guys recommend I use for the actual platform itself?
 
JustinLiang said:
I noticed that there is one that says 300 lbs capacity per mount and another one says 600 lbs capacity per mount. They are the same price so why would anyone want to purchase the 300 lb one?

In fact the ones from 40lb down seem to be the same size and price.

You would want to match capacity to load if vibration damping was important.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top