Levitating an Object with High Speed Fans: Calculate Energy Needs

AI Thread Summary
To levitate a 2500 kg object using high-speed fans, calculating energy needs requires understanding the aerodynamics involved. If the object is placed in an airtight chamber, maintaining air pressure beneath it could minimize energy consumption after initial pressurization. In free air, effective fan configuration is crucial, as inefficient airflow can lead to wasted energy. Building scale models for fluid dynamics experiments is recommended to optimize design and performance. Accurate calculations and configurations will ensure maximum durability and efficiency in the levitation system.
Ronhrin
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the best ways to levitate a 2500 Kg ~ 5000 Pounds object at aproximately 1 ~ 2 meters from the ground by the means of high speed fans strategicly located beneath the respective object.

how can I calculate the amount of energy that I need and discover the best configuration for the maximum durability and smallest energy comsuption possible?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
look into magnets
 
The problem cannot be answered without a great deal more information.

If the object were used as the piston in a airtight chamber, you'd only need to use an air pump to create or maintain air pressure under the object. If your system were entirely air-tight, it would require no work at all, after the initial pressurization.

On the other hand, if the object is in free air, with fans under it, then the aerodynamics of the object become exceedingly important. If most of the air just ends up "blowing around" the object, rather than actually imparting force on the object, then you'll need enormous fans.

My advice would be to construct some accurate scale models, and do your fluid dynamics experiments with that.

- Warren
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top