Liboff: A decent undergrad textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicist311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Liboff (4th ed.) receives mixed reviews among physics undergraduates. Some users find it a solid resource, noting its comprehensive material, but caution that its non-standard organization may require following a course syllabus closely. In contrast, many recommend Griffiths' book as a superior choice for beginners due to its clarity and better physical motivation, making it more suitable for self-study. Shankar's text is also mentioned favorably for its self-contained nature. Overall, the consensus leans towards Griffiths as the preferred option for students new to quantum mechanics, with Liboff viewed as merely acceptable.
physicist311
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
At our university we use Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Liboff 4th ed. What are your opinions on that book? I write this as a physics undergrad going to take QM next spring and looking for a decent well explained QM book to study over the summer. I also have a strong math background in Calc, ODE's, and Linear Algebra. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Liboff as an undergrad and I think it is a very good book. The organization is non-standard, so it would be good to use a course syllabus as a guide (I would guess that the syllabus will do some jumping between chapters).
 
confinement, how would you compare it to other books like Griffiths and Shankar?
 
I didn't really care for Liboff. It has maybe a bit more material than Shankar, but not as much physical motivation. Shankar is also much more self-contained and conducive to self-study.
 
I am reading forums time to time, but i was not a member up to now. I just registered to say this;

stay away from liboff in any case. griffiths' book is far way better than it. Shankar is a good book, too. Griffiths' book is a good start, though.
 
Thanks Bozon. Since I first posted the topic, I have been talking to other students and grad students around the physics dept. about Liboff. Most agreed it was an OK book at best. Also, many told me that Griffiths is the best for a student first entering QM. So I think I will study Griffiths this summer. To everybody who replied: thanks for the help.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top