Liboff: A decent undergrad textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicist311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Undergrad
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of "Introductory Quantum Mechanics" by Liboff, 4th edition, as a textbook for undergraduate physics students. While some users find it a decent resource, the consensus leans towards recommending David Griffiths' textbook as superior for beginners in quantum mechanics. Griffiths is praised for its clarity and self-contained nature, making it more suitable for self-study compared to Liboff. Overall, students are advised to prioritize Griffiths for a foundational understanding of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with calculus, ordinary differential equations (ODEs), and linear algebra
  • Knowledge of course syllabi for structured learning
  • Experience with self-study techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David Griffiths
  • Explore "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by R. Shankar
  • Review course syllabi for quantum mechanics to align study materials
  • Engage in online forums for discussions on quantum mechanics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators seeking textbook recommendations, and anyone looking to build a strong foundation in quantum mechanics.

physicist311
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
At our university we use Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Liboff 4th ed. What are your opinions on that book? I write this as a physics undergrad going to take QM next spring and looking for a decent well explained QM book to study over the summer. I also have a strong math background in Calc, ODE's, and Linear Algebra. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Liboff as an undergrad and I think it is a very good book. The organization is non-standard, so it would be good to use a course syllabus as a guide (I would guess that the syllabus will do some jumping between chapters).
 
confinement, how would you compare it to other books like Griffiths and Shankar?
 
I didn't really care for Liboff. It has maybe a bit more material than Shankar, but not as much physical motivation. Shankar is also much more self-contained and conducive to self-study.
 
I am reading forums time to time, but i was not a member up to now. I just registered to say this;

stay away from liboff in any case. griffiths' book is far way better than it. Shankar is a good book, too. Griffiths' book is a good start, though.
 
Thanks Bozon. Since I first posted the topic, I have been talking to other students and grad students around the physics dept. about Liboff. Most agreed it was an OK book at best. Also, many told me that Griffiths is the best for a student first entering QM. So I think I will study Griffiths this summer. To everybody who replied: thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K