Lie Algebra differentiable manifold

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Okey, I have problem with the foundation of lie algebra. This is my understanding:

We have a lie group which is a differentiable manifold. This lie group can for example be SO(2), etc.

Then we have the Lie algebra which is a vectorspace with the lie bracket defined on it: [. , .].
This lie algebra will, when we put it in the exponential mapping, give the Lie group.

For example: su(2) = R(0, 1; -1, 0).

I hope this is correct.

The we come to representation space.. Well in the example above our elements of the Lie group, G, will be represented by a matrix: A = exp(t x) where x belongs to the lie algebra, and t is our parameter. Does this mean that the vector space of n,n matrices is our representation space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart of minor inexactitudes: when you have a group consisting of some set of nxn matrices, then, yes, the set of all nxn matrices can be considered as a particular representation space - usually a reducible one.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
438
Back
Top