Lie derivative and Riemann tensor

lark
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a spacetime with an observer at rest at the origin, and the surface at t = 0 going through the origin, and passing through the surface there are geodesics along increasing time. Then as you get a small ways away from the surface, the geodesics start to deviate from each other. Within a small region around the origin, the geodesic deviation is \tau x^b {R_{0b0}}^d, where \tau is the proper time as measured by the observer, x^b is the position vector on the surface at t = 0, and {R_{0b0}}^d is the Riemann tensor at the origin. So the 4-velocity of points starting from rest at t = 0 is \tau x^b {R_{0b0}}^d + (1,0,0,0).
So can you get the Riemann tensor, at least the {R_{0b0}}^d components, as some kind of Lie derivative - what happens to the position vector of a point as it's carried along by the time flow vector field? I think it'd be a second Lie derivative, the points start out at rest so the first Lie derivative would be 0.
Laura
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The curvature tensor is related to the affine connection on the manifold, which has to do with how nearby tangent spaces relate to each other. The Lie derivative on the other hand does not depend on any connection, only on the pullback using the flow of a local vector field. You therefore should generally not expect the two concepts to be related. While both the connection and the Lie derivative have several properties that you would typically associate with a derivative, only the connection is a natural directional derivative as ##\nabla_{fX} Y = f \nabla_X Y##, where ##f## is a scalar function. This does not hold for the Lie derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes strangerep
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top