I Lie derivative of a differential form

daxowax
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a maybe unusual question. In a paper, I recently found the equation $$\mathcal{L}_v(v_i dx^i) = (v^j \partial_j v_i + v_j \partial_i v^j) dx^i$$
Where v denotes velocity, x spatial coordinates and \mathcal{L}_v the Lie derivative with respect to v. Now I'm an undergraduate who understands very little of differential geometry. Besides this, my paper does not require any knowledge of this discipline.

Is there someone who could help me out with some rough explanation or short derivation of this formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is basically the product rule, Leibniz's rule resp. of differentiation: the directional derivative of ##v_i## along ##v## performed in ##x-##coordinates. You may search the web for "Lie derivative product rule" for a proof that fits the terminology you are used to.
I assume it will be one of the first properties stated in every book that defines the Lie derivative. I first thought it would even be part of the definition before I looked it up to be sure.
 
Thanks, I think this has put me on the right track. My current attempt:
Using the product rule, we get
$$\mathcal{L}_v(v_i dx^i) = \mathcal{L}_v (v_i) dx^i + v_i \mathcal{L}_v (dx^i)$$
Interpreting \mathcal{L}_v as a directional derivative the first term equals v^j \partial_j v_i dx^i. For the second one we get v_i d \mathcal{L}_v (x^i), since the Lie derivative is said to commute with the exterior derivative. Furthermore:
$$ \begin{align*}
v_i d \mathcal{L}_v (x^i) & = v_i d(v^j \partial_j x^i) \\
& = v_i d(v^i) \\
& = v_i \partial_j v^i dx^j
\end{align*}
$$
Relabeling the indices results in $$\mathcal{L}_v(v_i dx^i) = v^j \partial_j v_i dx^i + v_j \partial_i v^j dx^i$$ Please correct me if I'm wrong!
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top