Life expectancy of Aqueous Flux going LowZ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the life expectancy of water-soluble flux in low-Z applications, particularly regarding conductive material migration and its impact on low impedance bridges under varying humidity and temperature conditions. Participants highlight the significance of dendritic migration, noting that it can occur within a few hundred hours when a voltage difference exists between conductors. The conversation emphasizes the need for specific data on the failure rates of components with residual flux, especially under large BGAs where complete flux removal is challenging. Suggestions for further research include looking into industry studies and resources related to BGA reliability and PCB cleaning. The thread ultimately seeks to gather more empirical data on the longevity and reliability of aqueous flux in these contexts.
edwardtre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Looking for any life expectancy data for water soluble flux going low Z. How long it takes for conductive material to migrate and cause low impedance bridges at any humidity or temperature.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
edwardtre said:
Looking for any life expectancy data for water soluble flux going low Z. How long it takes for conductive material to migrate and cause low impedance bridges at any humidity or temperature.

Welcome to the PF.

Are you asking specifically just about the flux aspect, or about dendritic migration of copper in general?

I did a Google search on dendritic migration pc board, and got some good hits:

https://www.google.com/search?sourc..._l=hp...0i22i30l5.0.0.1.13565...0.YrpWiZego6U

Once you have a voltage difference between conductors of a couple of volts or so, you can get dendritic migration to happen in a few hundred hours, depending on temperature and PC board cleanliness...
 
Thanks for the response. Specifically the conductive material that is part of the flux. Need to consider expected failure rate of a component with water soluble flux (OA) residue left under a BGA (BGA too large to allow for complete removal of flux (45mm part). Though I guess it could be a combination of the flux and exposed copper...
 
edwardtre said:
Thanks for the response. Specifically the conductive material that is part of the flux. Need to consider expected failure rate of a component with water soluble flux (OA) residue left under a BGA (BGA too large to allow for complete removal of flux (45mm part). Though I guess it could be a combination of the flux and exposed copper...

It seems like there should be some good PCBA industry studies on this. I Googled bga reliability pcb cleaning, and got some good hits. Maybe have a look at the hit list to see if you see any new information:

https://www.google.com/search?sourc...cleaning&gs_l=hp...0.0.0.9110...0.epKIo8N_xH8

:smile:
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Back
Top