Light as a Constant: Examining the Paradox

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of light as a constant speed for all observers, exploring the implications of this concept in relation to classical mechanics and relativistic physics. Participants examine examples, such as the baseball analogy, and reference experimental evidence to support their viewpoints.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how light can be a constant for any observer, using the analogy of a baseball thrown from a moving train to illustrate their confusion.
  • One participant corrects the baseball analogy, stating that the speed of the baseball relative to the ground would be slightly less than the expected sum due to relativistic effects, suggesting that this is a key difference when considering light.
  • Another participant asserts that the constancy of light is simply how the universe operates, emphasizing that it is not a construct of human design.
  • A participant references the Michelson-Morley experiment as evidence that the speed of light remains constant regardless of the motion of the observer, along with other experiments that support the principles of special relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of light's constancy, with some accepting it as a fundamental aspect of the universe while others seek clarification through analogies and examples. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on specific examples and experimental references, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of classical mechanics to relativistic scenarios. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the interpretation of these examples.

matt4584
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
 
Science news on Phys.org
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
You are mistaken about the baseball example: in fact the observer on the ground measures the speed of the baseball to be very slightly less than 50m/s.

If the speed of the train is ##u## and the ball is thrown at speed ##v##, its speed relative to the ground will not be ##u+v##, it will be ##(u+v)/(1+\frac{uv}{c^2})##. This formula has been verified by experiment.

It would be a good exercise to try calculating this for the speeds in your example; you will quickly see why in daily life we never notice that ##(u+v)## is not exactly correct. It's also worth seeing what happens when you set ##v=c##, shining a light forward in the moving train.
 
Last edited:
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?

Because that's the way the universe works. None of us built it. We just found it this way. Cool, isn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: John Park, XZ923 and davenn
matt4584 the classic observation of this is the Michelson Morley experiment where light beams were sent parallel to the rotation of the surface Earth which is also pretty close to the direction of motion of the Earth about the sun and normal to the direction of rotation of the Earth and its direction of rotation about the sun. The velocity of light is measured to be the same in both directions, which it would not be if a medium through which the Earth moved in its motion about the sum had existed. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment) for more detail. The Kennedy-Thorndike experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy–Thorndike_experiment) directly confirms that the speed of light is constant and with the Ives Stilwell experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ives–Stilwell_experiment) confirms the Lorentz transformation of special relativity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
20K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K