Light: Fringes and Interference

AI Thread Summary
Coherent light with a wavelength of 597 nm creates an interference pattern with the first-order bright fringe located 4.84 mm from the center. To find the wavelength for the first-order dark fringe at the same position, the formula for destructive interference is used, specifically d*sin(theta) = (m + 1/2)*lambda, where m=0. The position of the fringes is determined using y = m*lambda*L/d for bright fringes and y = (m + 1/2)*lambda*L/d for dark fringes. By comparing the equations for both wavelengths, it is concluded that the second wavelength is twice that of the first, leading to the final answer expressed in micrometers. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving interference problems effectively.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Coherent light with wavelength 597 nm passes through two very narrow slits, and the interference pattern is observed on a screen a distance of 3.00 m from the slits. The first-order bright fringe is a distance of 4.84 mm from the center of the central bright fringe.

For what wavelength of light in micrometers will the first-order dark fringe be observed at this same point on the screen?

To solve this, I must use the formula for destructive interference:
d*sin(theta) = (m + 1/2)*lambda, where m= 0 or -1 since it is the first dark fringe,

but I am stuck on using small-angle approximations where sin(theta) = tan(theta) to find d.

Could someone please explain this method to me clearly?

After finding d, what formula must I use for the 2nd beam's interference pattern to find the 2nd wavelength?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bright fringes are found where d \sin\theta = m\lambda; dark fringes where d \sin\theta = (m + 1/2)\lambda. m = 0, 1, 2, etc.

The position (y) of the fringes is given by \tan\theta = y/L. For small angles \tan\theta = \sin\theta = \theta. So the bright fringes are found at y = m\lambda L /d; the dark fringes at y = (m + 1/2)\lambda L /d.

Note that d, L, and y stay the same for the two wavelengths. Hint: Solve for the new wavelength symbolically before plugging in any numbers.
 
What value is y in the problem? 4.84 mm?
 
Soaring Crane said:
What value is y in the problem? 4.84 mm?
That's correct. Note that the same value of y is used for both wavelengths:
For the first, y = 4.84mm is the postion of the first bright fringe
For the second, y = 4.84mm is the postion of the first dark fringe​

Hint: You don't really need to plug in that y value! What you need to do is find the second wavelength in terms of the first.
 
How do I do this? Do I use the formula for bright fringes for the second beam as a starting point?
 
Here's what I suggest: Call the first wavelength \lambda_1 and the second \lambda_2. Now write the appropriate equation for each and compare. I'll write the equation for the first wavelength. Since it gives the location of the first bright fringe, I'll set m = 1:
y = \lambda_1 L /d
Rearranging that gives you: \lambda_1 = yd/L

Now you write the equation that applies to the second wavelength and compare.
 
Well, for the second, is it this?

y = [(m + 1/2)*lambda_2*L]/[d], where m = 0

lambda_2 = (2*y*d)/L
 
Exactly. So... how does \lambda_2 compare to \lambda_1?
 
It's twice the value of lambda_1.
 
  • #10
Correct. Now express the answer in micrometers and you're done.
 
Back
Top