Light hitting a superconductor?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Superconductor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction of X-rays with superconductors, particularly whether X-rays can penetrate superconducting materials when they are in their superconducting state. Participants explore the implications for diagnostic techniques used in superconductivity research and the fundamental properties of superconductors in relation to electromagnetic radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether X-rays can pass through a superconductor when it is cooled to its superconducting state.
  • Another participant argues that if X-rays could penetrate superconductors, it would undermine the utility of various diagnostic techniques that rely on X-ray interactions, citing the prevalence of such studies in superconductivity research.
  • A participant acknowledges the previous point and expresses intent to research the topic further.
  • One participant proposes that superconductors, due to their zero resistivity, might act as perfect shields against electromagnetic radiation, but questions whether this property holds true for high-frequency radiation like X-rays.
  • The same participant speculates that at high frequencies, the interaction between the electromagnetic field and free electrons may not occur as effectively, potentially allowing X-rays to pass through superconductors similarly to non-superconducting materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interaction of X-rays with superconductors, with some suggesting that superconductors may not be opaque to X-rays while others highlight the implications for diagnostic techniques. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the behavior of electromagnetic radiation in relation to superconductors that are not fully explored, particularly concerning the frequency dependence of transparency and the conditions under which superconductivity alters material properties.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
can x-rays go through a superconductor when it cooled down to its superconducting state.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Er.. if it does, then diagnostic techniques such as x-ray photoemission, x-ray diffraction, x-ray scattering, etc. will be useless for superconductors. You can do a search for yourself how many papers have been published in the study of superconductivity using such techniques.

Here's a question you should ask yourself: if x-rays have a tough time passing through ordinary metals, why would it pass through something that is an even better conductor?

Zz.
 
ok that's a good point. ill do some research on it .
 
Do superconductivity alters the X-ray transparency of a material?

If i remember correctly, conducting materials are opaque to EM radiation because the EM field interacts with the free electrons, losing energy during this process, and so the field gets weaker (attenuated) as it enters the material. If it were thick enough, we can say (almost) no EM radiation passes through it. Also, the more conducting the material, more attenuated the EM radiation is. So, we would conclude that a superconductor, which has zero resistivity, would be a perfect shield for EM radiation.

But if i remember correctly, this effect somehow stops working at very high frequencies (like X-rays or gamma rays), because the electrons are not "fast enough" to interact (and thus to absorb energy) from the EM radiation, and so it passes through the material as if were transparent.

So, my question is, do this also happens with a superconductor? Is it as transparent to X-rays as it would be if it were not a superconductor?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K