Light in Astronomy - Properties & Uses in Observing Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter AstroCook
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the properties of light in astronomy, particularly how they aid in the observation and discovery of celestial objects. Key topics include the speed of light, Doppler shift for velocity measurement, and the significance of different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. The relationship between a galaxy's rotation speed and its brightness is clarified, emphasizing that while faster rotation often correlates with greater mass and absolute brightness, this does not apply uniformly across all galaxy types. The Tully-Fisher and Faber-Jackson relationships are introduced to explain the connection between luminosity and rotation velocity for spiral and elliptical galaxies, respectively. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate astronomical observations and interpretations.
AstroCook
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a uni essay, the subject of which is how the properties of light are (and have been) used to discover and observe objects in astronomy. So far I'm looking into how the value of c is used, how doppler shift is used to determine velocities, how looking at the different parts of the EM spectrum can give a different view of the cosmos and something else that emcompasses spectroscopy/black body curves. If anyone can suggest additional relevant topics or websites that would be greatly appreciated or if you just want to discuss the above subjects that's also great.
Also, I read that the faster a galaxy rotates the greater its apparent brightness. Can anyone confirm this, if so would you be able to explain how it works or recommend a good site?
Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You could also discuss polarization measurements, which are important in most areas of astronomy. The topics you listed are far too broad for a specific discussion in this thread. Perhaps you can zero in on aspects of them that confuse you.


Also, I read that the faster a galaxy rotates the greater its apparent brightness.

The faster a galaxy rotates, the more massive it is. The more massive it is, the brighter it is (usually). However, this would be absolute, not apparent brightness.
 
Also, I read that the faster a galaxy rotates the greater its apparent brightness.
Note that it doesn't work the other way round (as far as we know) - some of the brightest (absolute, not apparent) galaxies seem to have little rotation - the cD monsters which reside at the hearts of rich clusters.
 
Nereid said:
Note that it doesn't work the other way round (as far as we know) - some of the brightest (absolute, not apparent) galaxies seem to have little rotation - the cD monsters which reside at the hearts of rich clusters.

Yes, thank you Nereid, that's an important distinction that I neglected to make. There is actually a very tight relationship between luminosity (or absolute brightness) and rotation velocity known as the Tully-Fisher relationship:

L_s \propto v^4

Note, however, that is only applies to spiral galaxies. Elliptical galaxies obey a similar relationship, but it instead relates luminosity and velocity dispersion:

L_e \propto \sigma^4

This is known as the Faber-Jackson relationship and is part of the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies. The distinction is made because, as Nereid said, elliptical galaxies don't exhibit organized rotation -- the stellar velocities are more isotropic. In both cases, however, you're measuring a quantity that corresponds approximately to the mean speed of stars at large distances from the center of the galaxy.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top