Light speed in a non Inertial frame of reference

In summary, the principle of invariant light speed does not hold in a non-inertial frame of reference. The Principle of Relativity only applies to inertial frames and different inertial frames are related by Galilei and Lorentz transforms in Newtonian and special relativistic mechanics. Defining an object's speed in a non-inertial frame is also difficult, as the speed depends on the measurement and when/how it is taken. The claim that the speed of light is invariant "locally" in special relativity does not have a clear meaning and can depend on the chosen coordinate system. In a proper reference frame, the local speed of light is always c, even in curved spacetime. "Locally" can also be interpreted
  • #1
Philip_Hu
1
0
Does the principle of invariant light speed still hold in a non Inertial frame of reference?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, it doesn't. The Principle of Relativity is is always stated for inertial frames only. Different inertial frames are related by Galilei and Lorentz transforms in Newtonian and special relativistic mechanics respectively.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
It's also hard to define an object's speed in a non-inertial frame. Ignore relativity for a moment: a car is moving at 30 mph in the street's rest frame. You're accelerating at 1 m/s^2. What's the car's speed in your frame? You'll see there is no single number - it depends on what you are measuring and when/how you are measuring it.
 
  • #4
:confused: I thought that it held locally since any region of spacetime is locally flat.
 
  • #5
The question is about Minkowski spacetime, which is globally flat. And the coordinate speed of light can be anything you want it to be, depending on what coordinate system you use.

It's a bit strange to say that something like this holds "locally" in Minkowski spacetime, because any "local inertial frame" (=comoving inertial frame) on Minkowski spacetime (which is globally flat) is actually a global inertial frame. So the claim that the speed of light is invariant "locally" in SR doesn't really mean anything, unless you explain what you mean of course. (It sounds like it could mean that the comoving inertial frame is an inertial frame, which is sort of implied by the name)

If we use the "proper reference frame" of an accelerating observer (i.e. the coordinate system constructed using the standard synchronization procedure), the coordinate speed of light emitted by the observer will depend on a lot of different things, but if he emits the light at the origin of his coordinates, it will at least start out with speed c. I guess that's one thing we could mean by "holds locally" (but I'd rather not use phrases like that).
 
  • #6
snoopies622 said:
:confused: I thought that it held locally since any region of spacetime is locally flat.
Fredrik said:
So the claim that the speed of light is invariant "locally" in SR doesn't really mean anything, unless you explain what you mean of course.
Fredrik said:
If we use the "proper reference frame" of an accelerating observer (i.e. the coordinate system constructed using the standard synchronization procedure), the coordinate speed of light emitted by the observer will depend on a lot of different things, but if he emits the light at the origin of his coordinates, it will at least start out with speed c. I guess that's one thing we could mean by "holds locally" (but I'd rather not use phrases like that).

Yes, locally could mean this. If any "photon" is (sufficiently close to being) coincident with any observer, accelerated or non-accleerated, in both special and general relativity, then, by using (sufficiently small) standard clocks and rulers, the observer measures the speed of the photon to be c. If the photon and the observer are not coincident, then, as Vanadium 50 has pointed out, the concept of speed speed is subtle (even more so in relativity), and, as pointed out by atyy and Fredrik, coordinate speed can take on any value.

Fredrik: sometimes (but not always) when a physicist says "local," the physicist means "in the tangent space." If an observer and a photon are coincident at event [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]\left\{\mathbf{e}_0, \mathbf{e}_1, \mathbf{e}_2, \mathbf{e}_3 \right\}[/itex] is an orthonormal frame Fermi-transported by the observer, then (if alignment is right), the tangent vector at [itex]p[/itex] of the photon's worldline is [itex]\mathbf{e}_0 + c \mathbf{e}_1[/itex]. Even for Minkowski spacetime, this is naturally interpreted as a statement about objects in the tangent space at [itex]p[/itex].

Unfortunately, "local" can mean quite different things for mathematicians and physicists.
 
  • #7
By "locally" I just meant "nearby" - in the sense that the surface of a sphere is flat if one looks at a small enough piece of it. Maybe I used the term inappropriately.
Fredrik said:
The question is about Minkowski spacetime, which is globally flat.
I don't see why "non-inertial frame of reference" implies flat spacetime. Am I not right now in a non-inertial frame of reference (I'm not freefalling as I type) in a spacetime that is curved?
 
  • #8
snoopies622 said:
:confused: I thought that it held locally since any region of spacetime is locally flat.

Yes. I gave my answer for the "global" speed of light in special relativity, which is restricted to flat spacetime.

If we talk about the "local" speed of light in a "proper reference frame", then it is always c, even in curved spacetime.

A proper reference frame (George Jones's "Fermi-transported orthonormal frame") is one that in which the metric is Minkowskian at the origin.

If the worldline is accelerated, then a proper reference frame is not locally inertial, because the Christoffel symbols, which contain first derivatives of the metric and represent inertial forces due to an accelerated frame of reference or "fake gravity", are not all zero.

If the worldline is free-falling, then a proper reference frame is locally inertial, because the Christoffel symbols are all zero. Even in a local inertial frame, the first derivatives of the Christoffel symbols, which are second derivatives of the metric, cannot all be zero, if spacetime curvature or "true gravity" is present.

snoopies622 said:
By "locally" I just meant "nearby" - in the sense that the surface of a sphere is flat if one looks at a small enough piece of it. Maybe I used the term inappropriately.

Strictly speaking "locally" in the above means "at a point" (George Jones's "tangent space"). It is not strictly true for any finite piece of spacetime (unless spacetime is flat, and an inertial frame is used), but practically speaking, a finite piece of spacetime that is small enough will be close enough to a "point" given limited sensitivity of experimental equipment.

There are other contexts where other mathematical statements (eg. about the extremal length of spacetime geodesics) are strictly true though locally means a finite piece of spacetime that is more than a point.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
When they say the speed of light is "locally" c in GR, this also implies that you are using a locally inertial reference frame, does it not? Even in an arbitrarily small region, couldn't you pick a locally non-inertial frame where the speed of light would be other than c?
 
  • #10
The idea of 'speed' is really not useful, or even defied in a non-inertial frame. In a general non-inertial frame, the coordiantes xμ are pretty much on the same footing, and there is no special 'time' coordinate. This already makes speed meaningless, but even if one could identify a natural time coordinate, the speed defined with respect to this would be different at different points due to the fact that the coordinates can twist and turn from point to point.

But a non-inertial observer can always construct a local inertial frame, which he can Fermi-Walker transport with himself. In this local inertial frame, the speed of light is always c.
 

What is light speed in a non Inertial frame of reference?

In a non Inertial frame of reference, light speed is still constant and equal to approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. However, due to the effects of acceleration or gravity, the observed speed of light may appear to change.

How does acceleration affect light speed in a non Inertial frame of reference?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, acceleration can cause time and space to become distorted, resulting in the observed speed of light appearing to change. This is known as the "Twin Paradox" and is a fundamental concept in understanding the effects of acceleration on light speed.

Does gravity impact light speed in a non Inertial frame of reference?

Yes, gravity can also cause time and space to become distorted, resulting in the observed speed of light appearing to change. This is known as gravitational time dilation and was famously confirmed by the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1959.

Is light speed the same in all non Inertial frames of reference?

Yes, according to the principle of relativity, the laws of physics, including the speed of light, are the same in all non Inertial frames of reference. However, the observed speed of light may vary due to the effects of acceleration or gravity in each frame.

How is light speed calculated in a non Inertial frame of reference?

To calculate the observed speed of light in a non Inertial frame of reference, the effects of acceleration or gravity must be taken into account. This can be done using the principles of special and general relativity, which provide mathematical equations to determine the observed speed of light in different situations.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
845
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
520
Back
Top