Lightweight Tubular Frame: Can it Float?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a lightweight tubular frame filled with a vacuum or lighter-than-air gas to achieve buoyancy. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of this concept, including potential applications in transportation and resource extraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a vacuum or lighter-than-air gas within a tubular frame to neutralize the frame's weight, questioning the smallest possible size for such a structure.
  • Another participant references historical attempts with hydrogen in airships, noting safety concerns and the impracticality of using a vacuum due to external air pressure stresses on the frame.
  • A suggestion is made to calculate the minimum wall thickness of the frame based on material density and atmospheric pressure considerations.
  • Further elaboration on the idea includes using a semi-rigid envelope to house lighter-than-air gas, aiming to increase cargo capacity for applications like salt water mining and hydrogen transport.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality of using a vacuum versus lighter-than-air gases, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the feasibility of the proposed designs.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about material properties, external pressures, and the economic viability of the proposed applications. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in scaling the design or the safety implications of using various gases.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in aerospace engineering, buoyancy concepts, resource extraction technologies, and innovative transportation solutions may find this discussion relevant.

Rooler
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can you use a vacuum, or lighter than air gas within a tubular frame network to neutralize the apparent weight of the frame? If this is possible what is thee smallest possible size you could make this frame, I understand that the more you scale it up the lighter proportionately the frame would become therefore finding the smallest possible size and working up into more useful sizes is the most logical and economical idea.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums!

A fellow named Zeppelin carried out your idea beginning about a hundred years ago, using a lighter-than-air gas: hydrogen, which ended up having disastrous consequences. Helium is safer but scarcer and much more expensive. A company in Germany is developing a semi-rigid airship which apparently does not try to cancel the weight of the frame completely:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeppelin_NT

I expect using a vacuum would be impractical because of the stresses that the external air pressure would produce on the frame.
 
Last edited:
You know the density of air; you can look up the density of materials from which you might wish to fabricate your framework; you can calculate a minimum wall thickness to resist atmospheric pressure (for vacuum), or to support your structure and loads; from wall thickness you calculate mass.
 
jtbell said:
Welcome to Physics Forums!

A fellow named Zeppelin carried out your idea beginning about a hundred years ago, using a lighter-than-air gas: hydrogen, which ended up having disastrous consequences. Helium is safer but scarcer and much more expensive. A company in Germany is developing a semi-rigid airship which apparently does not try to cancel the weight of the frame completely:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeppelin_NT

I expect using a vacuum would be impractical because of the stresses that the external air pressure would produce on the frame.
I knew about Zepplins design my idea is to use a lighter than air frame work to build a semi rigid envelope to house a lighter than air gas, the idea would be to increase the amount of cargo mass- envelope size
 
Rooler said:
I knew about Zepplins design my idea is to use a lighter than air frame work to build a semi rigid envelope to house a lighter than air gas, the idea would be to increase the amount of cargo mass- envelope size
My question came from an idea to set up salt water mining or salt refining plants on a coast line in an arid region of the world, concentrate the brine using electrolysis, releasing or harvesting the split O2 and filling airships with excess hydrogen "having collapsible envelopes for the return trip to allow larger amounts of cargo to be moved" to move cargoes of compressed hydrogen inland to be burned in power plants also producing clean water.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K