MHB This limit does not exist as it approaches 1 from both sides.

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit in question, $$\lim_{{R}\to{1}} \frac{1}{R - 1}$$, approaches infinity as R approaches 1 from either side. The application of L'Hôpital's rule is incorrect here because the limit is not in an indeterminate form; it diverges instead. The left-hand limit ($R \to 1^{-}$) approaches negative infinity, while the right-hand limit ($R \to 1^{+}$) approaches positive infinity, indicating that the limit does not exist (DNE). This discrepancy highlights the importance of considering one-sided limits in such cases.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
If I have this limit:

$$\lim_{{R}\to{1}} \frac{1}{R - 1}$$

I try to apply L'hopital's rule:

The derivative of 1 is 0, and the derivative of $R - 1$ is 1.

So I get $\frac{0}{1}$ which is 0. But apparently the answer is infinity.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not an indeterminate form; e.g. $\dfrac00$, $\dfrac{\infty}{\infty}$. Google "indeterminate form" for more information.
 
tmt said:
If I have this limit:

$$\lim_{{R}\to{1}} \frac{1}{R - 1}$$

I try to apply L'hopital's rule:

The derivative of 1 is 0, and the derivative of $R - 1$ is 1.

So I get $\frac{0}{1}$ which is 0. But apparently the answer is infinity.

What am I doing wrong?

I would actually give DNE for an answer, since:

$$\lim_{R\to1^{-}}\frac{1}{R-1}\ne\lim_{R\to1^{+}}\frac{1}{R-1}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top